Catholic Online Forum

The first interactive Catholic Forum on the web
It is currently 24 May 2013 17:46

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 15 Jan 2013 20:35 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4969
I wonder? I have a theory that I still smooth out and will post it here when the thoughts congeal.

There was only man and woman -why did satan choose woman. Because she was weaker? I think NOT.

How about because the most damage would be done this way? I think this is closer to the answer...

Further, I think that Pope John Paul II in Redemptoris Mater - March 25 1987 so much as implied indirectly if not directly this thought.

The thought came to me when considering what is evidenced today worldwide with the agenda against marriage, the agenda against family. and the agenda against morality, and the agenda against Judeo-Christian religions and Judeo-Christian premised cultures in general.

Factor all this in with a most prominent nexus in the culture wars -women. The war on women, violence against women, women's liberation, equal pay for women, reproductive health care, family planning, no fault divorce etcetera etcetrea yadda yadda yadda...

Are women today under attack again by the serpent -the master of lies? OR as some say are 'we' simply progressing?

As an aside, let me add that IF Adam & Eve had a child I would suspect the serpent would most definitely have as well targeted the child -this for a different reason altogether.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 08:30 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: 01 Mar 2009 06:51
Posts: 1795
Genesis 2: 18
The LORD God said: It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suited to him.

A wife is supposed to help her husband to get to Heaven, or at least make it easy for him.
A gentle woman soothes the savage beast. In the Old Wild West, men were shooting each other until the women showed up to civilize them.

By getting Eve to sin first the devil got her to compound her sin by not only disobeying God but tempting Adam.

_________________
Norman
...that is the regret of a lot of old people when they look back and realize too late what might have been.
This was what President Martin regretted. He thought he was doing something good. It was a disaster. How can anybody know what is the right thing to do?
-- Theresa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 08:48 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: 24 Aug 2012 07:30
Posts: 16
All the Caholics I know, including myself, don't take Genesis literally...as in there was a real garden of eden and
Adam and Eve. Curious as to if you take it literally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 08:56 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 12:15
Posts: 11439
Location: State of Michigan, USA
The literal sense of Scripture is that meaning that the author intended to convey. This literal sense is transmitted in different literary forms, including myth. "Myth" does not mean that the truths are untrue. And the literal sense is not to be confused with a "literalistic sense," where every jot and tittle of the text is considered to be historically accurate, although Catholics are free to believe the literalistic sense. The Church is the authentic interpreter of scripture, which must be read through the eyes of faith.

_________________
Dean
Most people's sense of history goes back to breakfast time - Benjamin Netanyahu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 09:08 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: 24 Aug 2012 07:30
Posts: 16
I agree that myths can help guide/lead to spiritual truths, but
it's very difficult to have an open discussion/debate with people
who believe that Adam and Eve actually existed in the Garden of Eden. Just as those who
completely refute evolution and believe the Earth is only THOUSANDS of years old.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 09:35 
Online
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 08:50
Posts: 6589
Location: Singapore
Indianaj,

Please sign your posts.

Ian De Cotta
Forum Staff


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 09:43 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 12:15
Posts: 11439
Location: State of Michigan, USA
IndianaJ wrote:
I agree that myths can help guide/lead to spiritual truths, but
it's very difficult to have an open discussion/debate with people
who believe that Adam and Eve actually existed in the Garden of Eden. Just as those who
completely refute evolution and believe the Earth is only THOUSANDS of years old.


Not really. I find it more difficult to have discussion with people who reject the central beliefs of the faith regarding who man is, his ultimate end or purpose for being, and the reality of sin and evil as a result of man's disobedience, and who use the Bible's non-scientific approach to conveying non-scientific truths as a battle-ax to reject major tenets of the faith. Those who read the Bible literalistically are already believers in the truth about God and man. But those who take Genesis to be merely a fairy tale usually also dissent from Catholic teaching, particularly regarding sin.

The myths in Genesis do not just "help guide/lead to spiritual truths." They actually proclaim truth. Truth about God, about man, about the Fall, about the relationship between man and woman and between humans and God, about marriage, about man's dominion over creation, about his superiority to all other creation, about his condition. Genesis was not written to be a scientific treatise on how the earth was created or precisely how the Fall from grace occurred, as if pre-historic man would understand them anyway. And those points really aren't worth debating. I would never bother participating in them.

_________________
Dean
Most people's sense of history goes back to breakfast time - Benjamin Netanyahu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 12:36 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4969
IndianaJ wrote:
All the Caholics I know, including myself, don't take Genesis literally...as in there was a real garden of eden and
Adam and Eve. Curious as to if you take it literally.



I take it literally. Any supposed doubt, confusion, or contradiction etcetera I might find or be pointed toward in Genesis or for that matter all Scripture I simply acknowledge as a lack of understanding on my part. I am not of the mindset that I can call myth what is truth EVEN if a crowd stands in agreement with me in making such a declaration..

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Last edited by dlm on 16 Jan 2013 12:40, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 12:39 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4969
IndianaJ wrote:
I agree that myths can help guide/lead to spiritual truths, but
it's very difficult to have an open discussion/debate with people
who believe that Adam and Eve actually existed in the Garden of Eden. Just as those who
completely refute evolution and believe the Earth is only THOUSANDS of years old.


Why bother yourself with such discussion then?

You wish for an 'open' discussion as long as you define the terms and set the boundaries? You are closed and the room you sit within denies that which I embrace. You wish to discuss in the open THEN come out and discuss.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 13:16 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: 01 Mar 2009 06:51
Posts: 1795
Quote:
IndianaJ wrote:
I agree that myths can help guide/lead to spiritual truths, but
it's very difficult to have an open discussion/debate with people
who believe that Adam and Eve actually existed in the Garden of Eden. Just as those who
completely refute evolution and believe the Earth is only THOUSANDS of years old.


Whether there actually was a physical place called Garden of Eden is not important. The Garden of Eden may refer to Adam's state of innocence ( within which he lived ) rather than a place.

However,
no amount of obfuscation can get around the simple fact that at some moment in time ( sometime between the first fish crawling up on land and my breakfast this morning ) there was a first man and woman, and we call them Adam and Eve.

_________________
Norman
...that is the regret of a lot of old people when they look back and realize too late what might have been.
This was what President Martin regretted. He thought he was doing something good. It was a disaster. How can anybody know what is the right thing to do?
-- Theresa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 13:31 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4969
Who_started_this? wrote:
Genesis 2: 18
The LORD God said: It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suited to him.

A wife is supposed to help her husband to get to Heaven, or at least make it easy for him.
A gentle woman soothes the savage beast. In the Old Wild West, men were shooting each other until the women showed up to civilize them.

By getting Eve to sin first the devil got her to compound her sin by not only disobeying God but tempting Adam.


Yes, all that and more.

Letter of Pope John Paul II to Women - 29 June 1995

-small excerpt:
Quote:
It is thus my hope, dear sisters, that you will reflect carefully on what it means to speak of the "genius of women", not only in order to be able to see in this phrase a specific part of God's plan which needs to be accepted and appreciated, but also in order to let this genius be more fully expressed in the life of society as a whole, as well as in the life of the Church.


Some random thoughts...

I am quite familiar with the genius of women as evidenced thus far in my life through my mother, my wife, and my daughter.

Some could say that their strength could as well be their weakness WHEN alone -the same could be said of man and child. Family and society are structured, much like a structural arch with a woman representing the keystone. If one wished to destroy the structure or for that matter prevent said structures from being built in the first place then targeting the keystone would be 'key' to the destruction.

I would suggest that Eve would never have been tempted IF Eve and Adam were both present when the serpent presented temptation. IF this thought is correct THEN there is much to be derived from it.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 15:02 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 20:47
Posts: 3614
Location: Southwestern PA
Was the Garden of Eden located in what is now Iraq?

_________________
Pax et Bonum


Schultzz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 16:03 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2002 09:38
Posts: 1386
Location: Champaign, Illinois, USA
I believe it is quite possible to conjecture a (mostly) literal understanding of the reality of the original "Paradise of Pleasure", but the universe/world we see today is not it, although it still exists but is totally and absolutely inaccessable to us this side of death. The "mostly" part is that I think the description of the commission of the Original Sin is an extremely abbreviated metaphor for what Adam and Eve actually did.

_________________
Kent Wendler


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 16:06 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4969
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Was the Garden of Eden located in what is now Iraq?


Maybe.

I would say that the jury is still out and identifying an actual location is still more within a theoretical than proven realm.

For any interested, another theory:

Thoughts on Eden, the Flood, and the Persian Gulf

-small excerpt:
Quote:
I have been working on a project in the United Arab Emirates for the past year and have been exposed to and have been studying some of the Quaternary history of the Persian Gulf region. I have put together some ideas about the garden of Eden and the flood that to my knowledge have not been presented before.

First, there is a very large extinct drainage area that covers the southern half of the Arabian Peninsula that is thought to have had two outlets into the Persian Gulf region (see figure). The gulf was dry during the last glacial maximum and thus these rivers would have joined the Tigris and Euphrates in an area that must have been a very lush oasis. The drainage area fits well the description of the Pison and Gihon rivers in Genesis because their drainage areas extend into what is a modern and ancient gold producing region (Havilah), and into what was once part of the territory of Cush. Because Eden is described as being at the juncture of these four rivers that would place Eden at their confluence in the Persian Gulf.

Second, Genesis 2 opens by describing a very dry land where no rains falls but only a mist waters the land. Arabia is hyperarid today and much of the rain that does fall is generated from moisture off of the current Persian Gulf. So take away that large body of water during sea-level lowstand and the region would be even more arid. In fact, climate modeling people suggest an even drier period for the gulf region during the last glacial maximum. Thus the land could easily be described as having virtually no rain. In addition, I have been witness to morning fogs near the Gulf in the UAE. Thus it is easy for me to imagine a "mist" rising from the oasis waters to cover the plants in Eden with dew.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 16:42 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15740
Location: Southern California, Catholic
I read someplace that Satan knew from the time of his fall, that his defeat would come through a woman, but had no detail. Thus, he attacks the woman when possible. However, Mary was hidden from him; he never knew that she was there.

Don't know how much truth there is in that, or if it was just speculation.

There is an encyclical by Pope Pius XII on bible research. As I recall he said that the first 11 chapters of Genesis are a literary means of transmitting the information. That we are all descendents from an original couple [whatever their names were], and that there was a fall from grace that produced evil in mankind must be believed. The rest is open to interpretation.

Note that the brotherhood equality of mankind depend on the common decent. Otherwise various groups may have evolved at various times, we are not equal, and there are master races and untermench.

I once was involved in a case involving a particularly viscous killer. After it was over, a woman from one of the fundamentalist or evangelical churches commented that he was enough to convince on of Original Sin.

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013 17:18 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
For now, and since first break of dawn, the Fiend,
Mere Serpent in appearance, forth was come,
And on his quest where likeliest he might find
The only two of mankind, but in them 415
The whole included race, his purposed prey.
In bower and field he sought, where any tuft
Of grove or garden-plot more pleasant lay,
Their tendance or plantation for delight;
By fountain or by shady rivulet 420
He sought them both, but wished his hap might find
Eve separate; he wished, but not with hope
Of what so seldom chanced, when to his wish,
Beyond his hope, Eve separate he spies,
Veiled in a cloud of fragrance, where she stood...



Quote:
Behold alone 480
The Woman, opportune to all attempts—
Her husband, for I view far round, not nigh,
Whose higher intellectual more I shun,
And strength, of courage haughty, and of limb
Heroic built, though of terrestrial mould; 485
Foe not informidable, exempt from wound—
I not; so much hath Hell debased, and pain
Infeebled me, to what I was in Heaven.
She fair, divinely fair, fit love for Gods,
Not terrible, though terror be in love, 490
And beauty, not approached by stronger hate,
Hate stronger under show of love well feigned—
The way which to her ruin now I tend.”



Quote:
He, bolder now, uncalled before her stood,
But as in gaze admiring. Oft he bowed
His turret crest and sleek enamelled neck, 525
Fawning, and licked the ground whereon she trod.
His gentle dumb expression turned at length
The eye of Eve to mark his play; he, glad
Of her attention gained, with serpent-tongue
Organic, or impulse of vocal air, 530
His fraudulent temptation thus began:—
“Wonder not, sovran mistress (if perhaps
Thou canst who art sole wonder), much less arm
Thy looks, the heaven of mildness, with disdain,
Displeased that I approach thee thus, and gaze 535
Insatiate, I thus single, nor have feared
Thy awful brow, more awful thus retired.
Fairest resemblance of thy Maker fair,
Thee all things living gaze on, all things thine
By gift, and thy celestial beauty adore, 540
With ravishment beheld—there best beheld
Where universally admired. But here,
In this enclosure wild, these beasts among,
Beholders rude, and shallow to discern
Half what in thee is fair, one man except, 545
Who sees thee (and what is one?) who shouldst be seen
A Goddess among Gods, adored and served
By Angels numberless, thy daily train?”
So glozed the Tempter, and his proem tuned.
Into the heart of Eve his words made way, 550
Though at the voice much marvelling; at length,
Not unamazed, she thus in answer spake:—
“What may this mean? Language of Man pronounced
By tongue of brute, and human sense expressed!
The first at least of these I thought denied 555
To beasts, whom God on their creation-day
Created mute to all articulate sound;
The latter I demur, for in their looks
Much reason, and in their actions, oft appears.
Thee, Serpent, subtlest beast of all the field 560
I knew, but not with human voice endued;
Redouble, then, this miracle, and say,
How cam’st thou speakable of mute, and how
To me so friendly grown above the rest
Of brutal kind that daily are in sight: 565
Say, for such wonder claims attention due.”
To whom the guileful Tempter thus replied:—
“Empress of this fair World, resplendent Eve!
Easy to me it is to tell thee all
What thou command’st, and right thou shouldst be obeyed. 570
I was at first as other beasts that graze
The trodden herb, of abject thoughts and low,
As was my food, nor aught but food discerned
Or sex, and apprehended nothing high:
Till on a day, roving the field, I chanced 575
A goodly tree far distant to behold,
Loaden with fruit of fairest colours mixed,
Ruddy and gold. In nearer drew to gaze;
When from the boughs a savoury odour blown,
Grateful to appetite, more pleased my sense 580
Than smell of sweetest fennel, or the teats
Of ewe or goat dropping with milk at even,
Unsucked of lamb or kid, that tend their play.
To satisfy the sharp desire I had
Of tasting those fair Apples, I resolved 585
Not to defer; hunger and thirst at once,
Powerful persuaders, quickened at the scent
Of that alluring fruit, urged me so keen.
About the mossy trunk I wound me soon;
For, high from ground, the branches would require 590
Thy utmost reach, or Adam’s; round the Tree
All other beasts that saw, with like desire
Longing and envying stood, but could not reach.
Amid the tree now got, where plenty hung
Tempting so nigh, to pluck and eat my fill 595
I spared not; for such pleasure till that hour
At feed or fountain never had I found.
Sated at length, ere long I might perceive
Strange alteration in me, to degree
Of Reason in my inward powers, and Speech 600
Wanted not long, though to this shape retained.
Thenceforth to speculations high or deep
I turned my thoughts, and with capacious mind
Considered all things visible in Heaven,
Or Earth, or Middle, all things fair and good. 605
But all that fair and good in thy Divine
Semblance, and in thy beauty’s heavenly ray,
United I beheld—no fair to thine
Equivalent or second; which compelled
Me thus, though importune perhaps, to come 610
And gaze, and worship thee of right declared
Sovran of creatures, universal Dame!”
So talked the spirited sly Snake; and Eve,
Yet more amazed, unwary thus replied:—
“Serpent, thy overpraising leaves in doubt 615
The virtue of that Fruit, in thee first proved.
But say, where grows the Tree? from hence how far?
For many are the trees of God that grow
In Paradise, and various, yet unknown
To us; in such abundance lies our choice 620
As leaves a greater store of fruit untouched,
Still hanging incorruptible, till men
Grow up to their provision, and more hands
Help to disburden Nature of her bearth.”
To whom the wily Adder, blithe and glad;— 625
“Empress, the way is ready, and not long—
Beyond a row of myrtles, on a flat,
Fast by a fountain, one small thicket past
Of blowing myrrh and balm. If thou accept
My conduct, I can bring thee thither soon.” 630
“Lead, then,” said Eve. He, leading, swiftly rowled
In tangles, and made intricate seem straight,
To mischief swift. Hope elevates, and joy
Brightens his crest. As when a wandering fire,
Compact of unctuous vapour, which the night 635
Condenses, and the cold invirons round,
Kindled through agitation to a flame
(Which oft, they say, some evil Spirit attends),
Hovering and blazing with delusive light,
Misleads the amazed night-wanderer from his way 640
To bogs and mires, and oft through pond or pool,
There swallowed up and lost, from succour far:
So glistered the dire Snake, and into fraud
Led Eve, our credulous mother, to the Tree
Of Prohibition, root of all our woe; 645
Which when she saw, thus to her guide she spake:—
“Serpent, we might have spared our coming hither,
Fruitless to me, though fruit be here to excess,
The credit of whose virtue rest with thee—
Wondrous, indeed, if cause of such effects! 650
But of this tree we may not taste nor touch;
God so commanded, and left that command
Sole daughter of his voice: the rest, we live
Law to ourselves; our Reason is our Law.”
To whom the Tempter guilefully replied:— 655
“Indeed! Hath God then said that of the fruit
Of all these garden-trees ye shall not eat,
Yet lords declared of all in Earth or Air?”
To whom thus Eve, yet sinless:—“Of the fruit
Of each tree in the garden we may eat; 660
But of the fruit of this fair Tree, amidst
The Garden, God hath said, ‘Ye shall not eat
Thereof, nor shall ye touch it, lest ye die.’“
She scarce had said, though brief, when now more bold
The Tempter, but, with shew of zeal and love 665
To Man, and indignation at his wrong,
New part puts on, and, as to passion moved,
Fluctuates disturbed, yet comely, and in act
Raised, as of some great matter to begin.
As when of old some orator renowned 670
In Athens or free Rome, where eloquence
Flourished, since mute, to some great cause addressed,
Stood in himself collected, while each part,
Motion, each act, won audience ere the tongue
Sometimes in highth began, as no delay 675
Of preface brooking through his zeal of right:
So standing, moving, or to highth upgrown,
The Tempter, all impassioned, thus began:—
“O sacred, wise, and wisdom-giving Plant,
Mother of science! now I feel thy power 680
Within me clear, not only to discern
Things in their causes, but to trace the ways
Of highest agents, deemed however wise.
Queen of this Universe! do not believe
Those rigid threats of death. Ye shall not die. 685
How should ye? By the Fruit? it gives you life
To knowledge. By the Threatener? look on me,
Me who have touched and tasted, yet both live,
And life more perfect have attained than Fate
Meant me, by venturing higher than my lot. 690
Shall that be shut to Man which to the Beast
Is open? or will God incense his ire
For such a petty trespass, and not praise
Rather your dauntless virtue, whom the pain
Of death denounced, whatever thing Death be, 695
Deterred not from achieving what might lead
To happier life, knowledge of Good and Evil?
Of good, how just! of evil—if what is evil
Be real, why not known, since easier shunned?
God, therefore, cannot hurt ye and be just; 700
Not just, not God; not feared then, nor obeyed:
Your fear itself of death removes the fear.
Why, then, was this forbid? Why but to awe,
Why but to keep ye low and ignorant,
His worshipers? He knows that in the day 705
Ye eat thereof your eyes, that seem so clear,
Yet are but dim, shall perfectly be then
Opened and cleared, and ye shall be as Gods,
Knowing both good and evil, as they know.
That ye should be as Gods, since I as Man, 710
Internal Man, is but proportion meet—
I, of brute, human; ye, of human, Gods.
So ye shall die perhaps, by putting off
Human, to put on Gods—death to be wished,
Though threatened, which no worse than this can bring! 715
And what are Gods, that Man may not become
As they, participating godlike food?
The Gods are first, and that advantage use
On our belief, that all from them proceeds.
I question it; for this fair Earth I see, 720
Warmed by the Sun, producing every kind;
Them nothing. If they all things, who enclosed
Knowledge of Good and Evil in this Tree,
That whoso eats thereof forthwith attains
Wisdom without their leave? and wherein lies 725
The offence, that Man should thus attain to know?
What can your knowledge hurt him, or this Tree
Impart against his will, if all be his?
Or is it envy? and can envy dwell
In Heavenly breasts? These, these and many more 730
Causes import your need of this fair Fruit.
Goddess humane, reach, then, and freely taste!”
He ended; and his words, replete with guile,
Into her heart too easy entrance won.
Fixed on the Fruit she gazed, which to behold 735
Might tempt alone; and in her ears the sound
Yet rung of his persuasive words, impregned
With reason, to her seeming, and with truth.
Meanwhile the hour of noon drew on, and waked
An eager appetite, raised by the smell 740
So savoury of that Fruit, which with desire,
Inclinable now grown to touch or taste,
Solicited her longing eye; yet first,
Pausing a while, thus to herself she mused:—
“Great are thy virtues, doubtless, best of Fruits, 745
Though kept from Man, and worthy to be admired,
Whose taste, too long forborne, at first assay
Gave elocution to the mute, and taught
The tongue not made for speech to speak thy praise.
Thy praise he also who forbids thy use 750
Conceals not from us, naming thee the Tree
Of Knowledge, knowledge both of Good and Evil;
Forbids us then to taste. But his forbidding
Commends thee more, while it infers the good
By thee communicated, and our want; 755
For good unknown sure is not bad, or, had
And yet unknown, is as not had at all.
In plain, then, what forbids he but to know?
Forbids us good, forbids us to be wise!
Such prohibitions bind not. But, if Death 760
Bind us with after-bands, what profits then
Our inward freedom? In the day we eat
Of this fair Fruit, our doom is we shall die!
How dies the Serpent? He hath eaten, and lives,
And knows, and speaks, and reasons, and discerns, 765
Irrational till then. For us alone
Was death invented? or to us denied
This intellectual food, for beasts reserved?
For beasts it seems; yet that one beast which first
Hath tasted envies not, but brings with joy 770
The good befallen him, author unsuspect,
Friendly to Man, far from deceit or guile.
What fear I, then? rather, what know to fear
Under this ignorance of Good and Evil,
Of God or Death, of law or penalty? 775
Here grows the cure of all, this fruit divine,
Fair to the eye, inviting to the taste,
Of virtue to make wise. What hinders, then,
To reach, and feed at once both body and mind?”
So saying, her rash hand in evil hour 780
Forth-reaching to the Fruit, she plucked, she eat.
Earth felt the wound, and Nature from her seat,
Sighing through all her works, gave signs of woe
That all was lost. Back to the thicket slunk
The guilty Serpent, and well might, for Eve, 785
Intent now only her taste, naught else
Regarded; such delight till then, as seemed,
In fruit she never tasted, whether true,
Or fancied so through expectation high
Of knowledge; nor was Godhead from her thought. 790
Greedily she ingorged without restraint,
And knew not eating death. Satiate at length,
And hightened as with wine, jocond and boon,
Thus to herself she pleasingly began:—
“O sovran, virtuous, precious of all trees 795
In Paradise! of operation blest
To sapience, hitherto obscured, infamed,
And thy fair Fruit let hang, as to no end
Created! but henceforth my early care,
Not without song, each morning, and due praise, 800
Shall tend thee, and the fertil burden ease
Of thy full branches, offered free to all;
Till, dieted by thee, I grow mature
In knowledge, as the Gods who all things know,
Though others envy what they cannot give— 805
For, had the gift been theirs, it had not here
Thus grown! Experience, next to thee I owe,
Best guide: not following thee, I had remained
In ignorance; thou open’st Wisdom’s way,
And giv’st access, though secret she retire. 810
And I perhaps am secret: Heaven is high—
High, and remote to see from thence distinct
Each thing on Earth; and other care perhaps
May have diverted from continual watch
Our great Forbidder, safe with all his Spies 815
About him. But to Adam in what sort
Shall I appear? Shall I to him make known
As yet my change, and give him to partake
Full happiness with me, or rather not,
But keep the odds of knowledge in my power 820
Without copartner? so to add what wants
In female sex, the more to draw his love,
And render me more equal, and perhaps—
A thing not undesirable—sometime
Superior; for, inferior, who is free? 825
This may be well; but what if God have seen,
And death ensue? Then I shall be no more;
And Adam, wedded to another Eve,
Shall live with her enjoying, I extinct!
A death to think! Confirmed, then, I resolve 830
Adam shall share with me in bliss or woe.
So dear I love him that with him all deaths
I could endure, without him live no life.”



http://www.bartleby.com/4/409.html

From Paradise Lost: The Ninth Book

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jan 2013 09:51 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: 01 Mar 2009 06:51
Posts: 1795
After biting the apple Eve considers what to do next.............

Quote:
But to Adam in what sort
Shall I appear? Shall I to him make known
As yet my change, and give him to partake
Full happiness with me, or rather not,
But keep the odds of knowledge in my power 820
Without copartner? so to add what wants
In female sex, the more to draw his love,
And render me more equal, and perhaps—
A thing not undesirable—sometime
Superior; for, inferior, who is free?



So to Milton, the devil went after Eve first because she was inferior, knew it and wanted to be equal to Adam or even superior.

I like my explanation best: Eve doubled her guilt in disobediance and in not fulfilling her duty to help her husband which doesn't imply inferiority but possibly the opposite.

_________________
Norman
...that is the regret of a lot of old people when they look back and realize too late what might have been.
This was what President Martin regretted. He thought he was doing something good. It was a disaster. How can anybody know what is the right thing to do?
-- Theresa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jan 2013 18:56 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
A more conventional understanding of John Milton's Eve:

Quote:
Satan, disguised in the form of a serpent, successfully tempts Eve to eat from the Tree by preying on her vanity and tricking her with rhetoric.


Quote:
In her innocence, she is the model of a good wife, graceful and submissive to Adam. Though happy, she longs for knowledge and, more specifically, self-knowledge. Her first act in existence is to turn away from Adam and look at and ponder her own reflection.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise_lost

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jan 2013 19:54 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15610
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Who_started_this? wrote:
I like my explanation best:
:o

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2013 00:32 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5278
Location: Europe
LASaxman wrote:
Who_started_this? wrote:
I like my explanation best:
:o

LOL

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2013 08:15 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: 01 Mar 2009 06:51
Posts: 1795
Quote:
Quote:
I like my explanation best:


:-o


So, David, do you prefer Milton's answer based on seventeeth century ideas about Eve's inferiority, ?

_________________
Norman
...that is the regret of a lot of old people when they look back and realize too late what might have been.
This was what President Martin regretted. He thought he was doing something good. It was a disaster. How can anybody know what is the right thing to do?
-- Theresa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2013 11:35 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member
User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2012 19:09
Posts: 147
Quote:
Why did the serpent not attack the man, rather than the woman? You say he went after her because she was the weaker of the two. On the contrary. In the transgression of the commandment, she showed herself to be stronger...For she alone stood up to the serpent. She ate from the tree, but with resistance and dissent and after being dealt with perfidiously. But Adam partook of the fruit given by the woman, without even beginning to make a fight, without a word of contradiction - a perfect demonstration of consummate weakness and a cowardly soul. The woman, moreover, can be excused; she wrestled with a demon and was thrown. But Adam will not be able to find an excuse...he had personally received the commandment from God. ~ St. Irenaeus

_________________
Daisy Martin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2013 18:14 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Daisy,

Thanks.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2013 21:43 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member
User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2012 19:09
Posts: 147
You're welcome. When a woman belongs to the Catholic church and society looks down on her because of the perception that the Church has treated women poorly since the time of Eve these quotes are life savers and required for one's arsenal. :) Oh - and the fact that a woman (the Blessed Virgin) was God's greatest creation is good ammunition too. :) (But please do not confuse me with a feminist or someone that thinks it's 'not fair' women can't be priests. The Catholic church has got it 150% right on that one!)

_________________
Daisy Martin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Jan 2013 11:42 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15740
Location: Southern California, Catholic
Where was Adam while the serpent was tempting Eve? Did he just come on the scene after she ate the apple, or did he just stand on the sidelines waiting to see how it would turn out?

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Jan 2013 12:33 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member
User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2012 19:09
Posts: 147
Maybe he was watching the sports channel? :wink:

_________________
Daisy Martin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Jan 2013 21:07 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: 01 Mar 2009 06:51
Posts: 1795
Quote:
Where was Adam while the serpent was tempting Eve? Did he just come on the scene after she ate the apple, or did he just stand on the sidelines waiting to see how it would turn out?


Apparently Adam was right there.

Genesis ch 3
Quote:
6
The woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eyes, and the tree was desirable for gaining wisdom. So she took some of its fruit and ate it; and she also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.c
7
Then the eyes of both of them were opened


So it seems there was one cooperative act.

And then,
Quote:
16
To the woman he said:
I will intensify your toil in childbearing;
in pain* you shall bring forth children.
Yet your urge shall be for your husband,
and he shall rule over you.


Perhaps Eve was the dominant personality of the two. :roll:
Why not? No law against it.
So the devil spoke to Eve knowing Adam would go along with her.
Eve's punishment was to be ruled by her husband, but not by God's decree! God was merely predicting what would happen. Even today we see in some countries, ( can we say Moslem? ) women are oppressed by men.

_________________
Norman
...that is the regret of a lot of old people when they look back and realize too late what might have been.
This was what President Martin regretted. He thought he was doing something good. It was a disaster. How can anybody know what is the right thing to do?
-- Theresa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2013 15:29 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Joe,

Quote:
Where was Adam while the serpent was tempting Eve?


In Milton's account he was elsewhere in the garden.

Quote:
Now when as sacred Light began to dawne
In Eden on the humid Flours, that breathd
Thir morning incense, when all things that breath,
From th' Earths great Altar send up silent praise [ 195 ]
To the Creator, and his Nostrils fill
With grateful Smell, forth came the human pair
And joind thir vocal Worship to the Quire
Of Creatures wanting voice, that done, partake
The season, prime for sweetest Sents and Aires: [ 200 ]
Then commune how that day they best may ply
Thir growing work: for much thir work outgrew
The hands dispatch of two Gardning so wide.
And Eve first to her Husband thus began.

Adam, well may we labour still to dress [ 205 ]
This Garden, still to tend Plant, Herb and Flour,
Our pleasant task enjoyn'd, but till more hands
Aid us, the work under our labour grows,
Luxurious by restraint; what we by day
Lop overgrown, or prune, or prop, or bind, [ 210 ]
One night or two with wanton growth derides
Tending to wilde. Thou therefore now advise
Or hear what to my minde first thoughts present,
Let us divide our labours, thou where choice
Leads thee, or where most needs, whether to wind [ 215 ]
The Woodbine round this Arbour, or direct
The clasping Ivie where to climb, while I
In yonder Spring of Roses intermixt
With Myrtle, find what to redress till Noon:
For while so near each other thus all day [ 220 ]
Our taske we choose, what wonder if so near
Looks intervene and smiles, or object new
Casual discourse draw on, which intermits
Our dayes work brought to little, though begun
Early, and th' hour of Supper comes unearn'd. [ 225 ]

To whom mild answer Adam thus return'd.
Sole Eve, Associate sole, to me beyond
Compare above all living Creatures deare,
Well hast thou motion'd, well thy thoughts imployd
How we might best fulfill the work which here [ 230 ]
God hath assign'd us, nor of me shalt pass
Unprais'd: for nothing lovelier can be found
In Woman, then to studie houshold good,
And good workes in her Husband to promote.
Yet not so strictly hath our Lord impos'd [ 235 ]
Labour, as to debarr us when we need
Refreshment, whether food, or talk between,
Food of the mind, or this sweet intercourse
Of looks and smiles, for smiles from Reason flow,
To brute deni'd, and are of Love the food, [ 240 ]
Love not the lowest end of human life.
For not to irksom toile, but to delight
He made us, and delight to Reason joyn'd.
These paths & Bowers doubt not but our joynt hands
Will keep from Wilderness with ease, as wide [ 245 ]
As we need walk, till younger hands ere long
Assist us: But if much converse perhaps
Thee satiate, to short absence I could yield.
For solitude somtimes is best societie,
And short retirement urges sweet returne. [ 250 ]



_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group