Catholic Online Forum

The first interactive Catholic Forum on the web
It is currently 25 May 2013 13:34

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The End of the World ?
PostPosted: 13 Dec 2012 23:50 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member

Joined: 24 Sep 2003 02:14
Posts: 184
Someone said the end of the world won't happen in our time. It is not even close. I am not convinced. I remain skeptical.
His arguments are as follows:

• Conversion of the whole world must happen before the end of time. Now China and Israel have not converted yet. China is still persecuting Christians and Israel is still waiting for her messiah.

• The coming of the "Reign of Mary" was prophesied by Mother Mary in Fatima in 1917 and also by Saint Louis de Montfort of France. It didn't happen yet.

• Anti-Christ didn't appear yet.

• Saint John Bosco prophesied that Europe will return to the Church after her apostasy. This didn't happen yet.

• Christian civilizations should appear throughout the whole world to glorify God - before the end of time. This didn't happen yet.



What do you think ? Do you agree ?

____
Tom


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 00:10 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15612
Location: Los Angeles, CA
thomasC wrote:
Someone said the end of the world won't happen in our time. It is not even close. I am not convinced. I remain skeptical.

Tom,

I too am skeptical. It says in scripture that no one knows when the end will be.

Not even the Mayans. :wink:

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 05:37 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 20:47
Posts: 3621
Location: Southwestern PA
Jesus doesn't even know. So don't worry about it. Be like a good Boy Scout and "Be Prepared".

_________________
Pax et Bonum


Schultzz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 07:41 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2002 13:12
Posts: 3890
Location: Vallejo, California
thomasC wrote:

• Anti-Christ didn't appear yet.


Are you sure? :wink:

_________________
Pax et bonum,
Marie

JMJ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 09:25 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 16:17
Posts: 11528
Location: Enjoying the sight and aroma of blooming lilacs on a marvelous day in May …
The end of the world has been discussed in other threads here.

My response to the question is that discussion of when the physical universe ends may be a stimulating topic for an academic discussion but the truth is, it is going to end for each of us reading this within no more than decades.

And for folks my age and older, most likely within a couple of decades or less.

So I try to approach life as if the world will end tomorrow!

Being a fallible, sinful mortal, I far-too-often don't succeed . . .

But I won't waste a minute of whatever time I have left in this finite, material world worrying about when it all ends. I have enough to be concerned with in my small corner of it!

_________________
In Christ,

Jim B

I will consider your position if stated with firm, well-thought-out, quiet reasoning. Hateful diatribe, ad hominem attacks and shouted rhetoric don't impress.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 11:58 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15743
Location: Southern California, Catholic
retsinab wrote:
The end of the world has been discussed in other threads here.

My response to the question is that discussion of when the physical universe ends may be a stimulating topic for an academic discussion but the truth is, it is going to end for each of us reading this within no more than decades.

And for folks my age and older, most likely within a couple of decades or less.

So I try to approach life as if the world will end tomorrow!

Being a fallible, sinful mortal, I far-too-often don't succeed . . .

But I won't waste a minute of whatever time I have left in this finite, material world worrying about when it all ends. I have enough to be concerned with in my small corner of it!
Nothing brings this home more clearly than seeing a grave with ones name on it. They installed the stone on my wife's grave last week. It also bears my name and birth date since we will share the grave. All it needs is four more digits, and I think I can name three of them.

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 13:09 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7768
Location: Los Angeles, California
I've never thought much about it or worried at all about it. There are too many things in my personal world or the world of my loved ones that are ending or will end that I can't worry about a complete unknown. People have been expecting the end of the world for a long time. The Apostles thought Christ would soon return.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 15:46 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2792
The theories make for some entertaining TV programming!

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2012 16:38 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Tom,

Being sceptical can sometimes be a good thing. Being skeptical is best left to our friends and allies.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2012 19:33 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2002 13:12
Posts: 3890
Location: Vallejo, California
My husband died on December 21, 2010. He will miss the end of the world by two years.

_________________
Pax et bonum,
Marie

JMJ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2012 21:48 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5278
Location: Europe
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Jesus doesn't even know. So don't worry about it. Be like a good Boy Scout and "Be Prepared".


Jesus knows. He is God; He knows everything.

(Catechism 474) By its union to the divine wisdom in the person of the Word incarnate, Christ enjoyed in his human knowledge the fullness of understanding of the eternal plans he had come to reveal. What he admitted to not knowing in this area, he elsewhere declared himself not sent to reveal.

But your advice is good. :)

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2012 22:13 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15612
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Arwen wrote:
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Jesus doesn't even know. So don't worry about it. Be like a good Boy Scout and "Be Prepared".
Jesus knows. He is God; He knows everything.

(Catechism 474) By its union to the divine wisdom in the person of the Word incarnate, Christ enjoyed in his human knowledge the fullness of understanding of the eternal plans he had come to reveal. What he admitted to not knowing in this area, he elsewhere declared himself not sent to reveal.

But your advice is good. :)

But Jesus said he doen't know.

Matthew Chapter 24 wrote:
35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.
36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2012 22:20 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 20:47
Posts: 3621
Location: Southwestern PA
You're right again David.

_________________
Pax et Bonum


Schultzz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2012 22:29 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5278
Location: Europe
Guys,
It is some sort of heresy to say what you are saying... let me go see if I can find the name of it later.

John 21:17 He said to him the third time: Simon, son of John, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved, because he had said to him the third time: Lovest thou me? And he said to him: Lord, thou knowest all things: thou knowest that I love thee. He said to him: Feed my sheep.

There are lots of these paradoxes throughout the Bible.

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2012 22:35 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5278
Location: Europe
It is agnoeticism.

St. Augustine offers the following commentary: “According to the form of God everything that the Father has belongs to the Son for All things that are mine are yours, and yours are mine. According to the form of a slave, however, his teaching is not his own but of the One who sent him. Hence of that day or hour no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. He is ignorant of this in the special sense of making others ignorant. He did not know it in their presence in such a way as to be prepared to reveal it to them at that time.” So too the Catechism: “Christ enjoyed in his human knowledge the fullness of understanding of the eternal plans he had come to reveal. What he admitted to not knowing in this area, he elsewhere declared himself not sent to reveal.”

From Did Jesus know the day and the hour of the Apocalypse?

See also Jesus knew everything.

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 07:54 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2004 06:55
Posts: 1275
Location: Texas
LASaxman wrote:
thomasC wrote:
Someone said the end of the world won't happen in our time. It is not even close. I am not convinced. I remain skeptical.

Tom,

I too am skeptical. It says in scripture that no one knows when the end will be.

Not even the Mayans. :wink:


Very true! The Mayans did not account for leap year/365.24 days per year. The Mayans end of he world should have happened a couple of months ago.

Nothing will happen tomorrow, just like nothing happened when Y2K rolled around.

_________________
God bless,
Perry
+++


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 08:05 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 16:17
Posts: 11528
Location: Enjoying the sight and aroma of blooming lilacs on a marvelous day in May …
Perry wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
thomasC wrote:
Someone said the end of the world won't happen in our time. It is not even close. I am not convinced. I remain skeptical.

Tom,

I too am skeptical. It says in scripture that no one knows when the end will be.

Not even the Mayans. :wink:


Very true! The Mayans did not account for leap year/365.24 days per year. The Mayans end of he world should have happened a couple of months ago.

Nothing will happen tomorrow, just like nothing happened when Y2K rolled around.

Perry, by saying that nothing will happen tomorrow, are you, then, giving me permission not to get up in the morning and straighten up this cluttered computer room as I had planned? :wink:

_________________
In Christ,

Jim B

I will consider your position if stated with firm, well-thought-out, quiet reasoning. Hateful diatribe, ad hominem attacks and shouted rhetoric don't impress.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 08:11 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2004 06:55
Posts: 1275
Location: Texas
retsinab wrote:
Perry wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
thomasC wrote:
Someone said the end of the world won't happen in our time. It is not even close. I am not convinced. I remain skeptical.

Tom,

I too am skeptical. It says in scripture that no one knows when the end will be.

Not even the Mayans. :wink:


Very true! The Mayans did not account for leap year/365.24 days per year. The Mayans end of he world should have happened a couple of months ago.

Nothing will happen tomorrow, just like nothing happened when Y2K rolled around.

Perry, by saying that nothing will happen tomorrow, are you, then, giving me permission not to get up in the morning and straighten up this cluttered computer room as I had planned? :wink:


Sorry to burst your bubble, Jim! Get 'er done! LOL

_________________
God bless,
Perry
+++


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 08:24 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 16:17
Posts: 11528
Location: Enjoying the sight and aroma of blooming lilacs on a marvelous day in May …
Perry wrote:
retsinab wrote:
Perry, by saying that nothing will happen tomorrow, are you, then, giving me permission not to get up in the morning and straighten up this cluttered computer room as I had planned? :wink:


Sorry to burst your bubble, Jim! Get 'er done! LOL

That's what I was afraid of. <sigh> Back to the ol' grinding wheel! :(

_________________
In Christ,

Jim B

I will consider your position if stated with firm, well-thought-out, quiet reasoning. Hateful diatribe, ad hominem attacks and shouted rhetoric don't impress.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 10:26 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2792
Perry wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
thomasC wrote:
Someone said the end of the world won't happen in our time. It is not even close. I am not convinced. I remain skeptical.

Tom,

I too am skeptical. It says in scripture that no one knows when the end will be.

Not even the Mayans. :wink:


Very true! The Mayans did not account for leap year/365.24 days per year. The Mayans end of he world should have happened a couple of months ago.

Nothing will happen tomorrow, just like nothing happened when Y2K rolled around.


Ya mean I shouldn't have bought this Bently!

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 10:35 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15612
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Arwen wrote:
Guys,
It is some sort of heresy to say what you are saying... let me go see if I can find the name of it later.

I don't know how I could be committing heresy. I just quoted what Jesus said in the Gospel. :wink:

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 13:08 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 08:50
Posts: 6594
Location: Singapore
LASaxman wrote:
I don't know how I could be committing heresy. I just quoted what Jesus said in the Gospel. :wink:

You're just a carrier of the heresy, David.

It's along the same lines as healthy carriers of bugs and diseases. You don't display or suffer their symptoms until you go for medical tests and then your doctor diagnoses that your bodily system is infected with them. Grace just gave us a medical on the heresy. Now we need to get rid of this bug that is living in some of our souls. :wink:

_________________
Ian DC
Blessed Ever Virgin Mary -- Sanctuary and resting-place of the Blessed Trinity where God dwells in greater and more divine splendour than anywhere else in the universe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 15:43 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2792
I just checked my science sites for any unusual activity on the planet:

NO abnormal earthquake activity
NO abnormal volcanic activity
NO significant sunspot activity, it is approaching a maximum but much lower lower than the previous ones in 2001-2002

Of course there is still time before tomorrow. Is it time to start worrying about "unlucky" 2013?

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 16:07 
Offline
Proficient Member
Proficient Member

Joined: 11 Sep 2009 10:31
Posts: 959
Location: Roman Catholic (OblateSB)
bali wrote:
I just checked my science sites for any unusual activity on the planet:

NO abnormal earthquake activity
NO abnormal volcanic activity
NO significant sunspot activity, it is approaching a maximum but much lower lower than the previous ones in 2001-2002

Of course there is still time before tomorrow. Is it time to start worrying about "unlucky" 2013?



There are 2 tomorrows. One on both sides of the international date line. Always wondered why most don't seem to realize this (comment not aimed at you).

_________________
-Lou (Louis)
Image
ORA et LABORA
Totus Tuus
Cacciatore/Fungaiolo
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 16:23 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2792
Luigi Daniele wrote:
bali wrote:
I just checked my science sites for any unusual activity on the planet:

NO abnormal earthquake activity
NO abnormal volcanic activity
NO significant sunspot activity, it is approaching a maximum but much lower lower than the previous ones in 2001-2002

Of course there is still time before tomorrow. Is it time to start worrying about "unlucky" 2013?



There are 2 tomorrows. One on both sides of the international date line. Always wondered why most don't seem to realize this (comment not aimed at you).


It doesn't matter, I looked at global information. In fact on the North American continent including Greenland there are six tomorrows according to the time zones. All depends how fine we want to slice it.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 16:33 
Offline
Proficient Member
Proficient Member

Joined: 11 Sep 2009 10:31
Posts: 959
Location: Roman Catholic (OblateSB)
bali wrote:
Luigi Daniele wrote:
bali wrote:
I just checked my science sites for any unusual activity on the planet:

NO abnormal earthquake activity
NO abnormal volcanic activity
NO significant sunspot activity, it is approaching a maximum but much lower lower than the previous ones in 2001-2002

Of course there is still time before tomorrow. Is it time to start worrying about "unlucky" 2013?



There are 2 tomorrows. One on both sides of the international date line. Always wondered why most don't seem to realize this (comment not aimed at you).


It doesn't matter, I looked at global information. In fact on the North American continent including Greenland there are six tomorrows according to the time zones. All depends how fine we want to slice it.


Excellent point!

_________________
-Lou (Louis)
Image
ORA et LABORA
Totus Tuus
Cacciatore/Fungaiolo
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 16:42 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15743
Location: Southern California, Catholic
bali wrote:
I just checked my science sites for any unusual activity on the planet:

NO abnormal earthquake activity
NO abnormal volcanic activity
NO significant sunspot activity, it is approaching a maximum but much lower lower than the previous ones in 2001-2002

Of course there is still time before tomorrow. Is it time to start worrying about "unlucky" 2013?


Isn't that a sign?
Quote:
37* As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of man. 38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 39 and they did not know until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of man.
Matthew 24:37-39 A day like all days until !!!

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2012 18:50 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2792
gabriel wrote:
bali wrote:
I just checked my science sites for any unusual activity on the planet:

NO abnormal earthquake activity
NO abnormal volcanic activity
NO significant sunspot activity, it is approaching a maximum but much lower lower than the previous ones in 2001-2002

Of course there is still time before tomorrow. Is it time to start worrying about "unlucky" 2013?


Isn't that a sign?
Quote:
37* As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of man. 38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 39 and they did not know until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of man.
Matthew 24:37-39 A day like all days until !!!


I don't know, it's the normal condition. Of course that's the point in scripture; be ready because we don't know when He will come. Personally, I'm curious to hear the "Unlucky 2013" warnings, they should be even stranger than the Mayan stuff. I'm sure someone will find some 2013 Nostradamus predictions.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Dec 2012 00:12 
Offline
Proficient Member
Proficient Member
User avatar

Joined: 07 Apr 2008 17:51
Posts: 621
Location: Malaysia
“If there are many who believe the world will end on December 21, as the Church, we have no problem with them naming us as the beneficiaries of their possessions in their wills.”
Bishop Bernardo Bastres Florence of Punta Arenas
:wink:

_________________
Pax Christi,
Fred D

Wherever Jesus Christ is present, there is the Catholic Church.- St. Ignatius of Antioch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2012 16:51 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 07:34
Posts: 125
Location: Central Florida
Greetings one and all. Since this forum is for speculation; may I consider the "End-of-Time" question from a different perspective? I believe that it is an accepted fact (??) that God does nothing for no reason; that there is a purpose for everything that He does. Alright, There are (who knows; but let's use a number) billions upon billions of celestial bodies throughout the universe and that the distances from wherever to wherever are X to the Nth power. Well, it may well be likely that it will take mankind (and/or womankind) millions of years to "visit" the furthest places plus, including assuming that the universe continues to expand all that time. So, the "End Time" is a bit "further down the road" is it not???

Just a thought!!

Merry Christmas to one and all, Frank

_________________
Frank Russell
The more you learn; the more you learn that there is to learn!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2012 16:59 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Lou,

Quote:
There are 2 tomorrows. One on both sides of the international date line.


I am unreliably informed that the Mayan long calendar's cycle was completed at 11:11 GMT.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2012 17:01 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Frank,

That God created billions of celestial bodies does not imply that He intended Man should visit all of them.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2012 18:23 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2792
Saw an ad for a T-Shirt saying:
"The End Of the World,
I Was There"

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2012 19:11 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15743
Location: Southern California, Catholic
Luigi Daniele wrote:
...
There are 2 tomorrows. One on both sides of the international date line. ....
If one is on both sides of the dateline, where is the other one?

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2012 20:02 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 20:47
Posts: 3621
Location: Southwestern PA
gabriel wrote:
Luigi Daniele wrote:
...
There are 2 tomorrows. One on both sides of the international date line. ....
If one is on both sides of the dateline, where is the other one?



Wherever God wants it to be.

_________________
Pax et Bonum


Schultzz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 10:54 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 07:34
Posts: 125
Location: Central Florida
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Frank,

That God created billions of celestial bodies does not imply that He intended Man should visit all of them.


Hi Jim,
You, of course, could be quite right. Then again there is the question as to why He would create a universe where not only the life forms; but, the inanimate celestial bodies also are under constant change. Could be one of His ways of showing that He does not create something and then leave it to it's own resources no matter, to us, the vastness and distances involved. On a much larger scale, it is another arguement against Evolution, at least without divine guidance, and the idea of Randomness. There are many who are easily convinced about Darwin's "natural selection" involving life forms; but, would have a difficult time defending it on a celestial basis with inanimiate objects. It seems that it is a defense of the existance of God that should be more utilized. More then enough is known and understood about the workings and patterns that exist throughout the universe.

Happy & Blessed & safe New Year to one and all, Frank

_________________
Frank Russell
The more you learn; the more you learn that there is to learn!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 11:13 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15612
Location: Los Angeles, CA
philosophicallyfrank wrote:
I believe that it is an accepted fact (??) that God does nothing for no reason; that there is a purpose for everything that He does.

I'm not sure that is an "accepted fact". And God certainly does not need to explain or justify His actions.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 14:50 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Frank,

I believe quantum theory deals with the problem of randomness by means of probability theory.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 15:58 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 07:34
Posts: 125
Location: Central Florida
LASaxman wrote:
philosophicallyfrank wrote:
I believe that it is an accepted fact (??) that God does nothing for no reason; that there is a purpose for everything that He does.

I'm not sure that is an "accepted fact". And God certainly does not need to explain or justify His actions.


Hi Dave,
While there are a lot of things that I have never heard of; I haven't heard of anyone in the Church who considers that God can be frivolous. We believe that God is absolute perfection and it would "seem" that logically frivolity and "absolute" perfection could not co-exist. Assuming that to be true; then an "accepted fact" would seem to be the logical conclusion.
Don't mis-understand me; I certainly don't claim to be any kind of "expert" in any area; I am only expressing my own opinions. It can be fun as well as stimulating to "speculate" on various ideas and see how others think.

Have a safe New Year's eve, Frank

_________________
Frank Russell
The more you learn; the more you learn that there is to learn!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 16:36 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 07:34
Posts: 125
Location: Central Florida
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Frank,

I believe quantum theory deals with the problem of randomness by means of probability theory.


Hi Jim,
I'll take your word for it; that is beyond me. However, I suspect that "quantum theory" is insufficient to explain God. Is God "subject" to the natural laws of mathmetics/physics that He created or that resulted from His creativity? Plus, my suggestion regarding the "End Time" would not be affected by any natural law; but, involves "God's Own timetable". It boils down to: when will God "pull the plug"? We will never know; but, it is fun to think "outside of the box" (and maybe it will forestall dementia/alzheimers). I would suggest that "logic" plays a bigger role then "natural law"; which is, of course, why we can only "speculate" about the "End Time".

Have a safe New Year's eve, Frank

_________________
Frank Russell
The more you learn; the more you learn that there is to learn!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 16:41 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Frank,

Quote:
However, I suspect that "quantum theory" is insufficient to explain God.


I believe it seeks to understand things much, much smaller than God.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 17:48 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15743
Location: Southern California, Catholic
It has been a long time since I attempted to understand Quantum Mechanics. At that time I just acquired enough knowledge of it to pass the exams for my degrees, and then got as far away from it as possible.

From what I have absorbed, I think that Quantum Mechanics is to reality what Life Expectancy tables are to health. That is that QM should be restricted to calculating results and not expected to explain causes.

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 20:06 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15612
Location: Los Angeles, CA
philosophicallyfrank wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
philosophicallyfrank wrote:
I believe that it is an accepted fact (??) that God does nothing for no reason; that there is a purpose for everything that He does.

I'm not sure that is an "accepted fact". And God certainly does not need to explain or justify His actions.

Hi Dave,
While there are a lot of things that I have never heard of; I haven't heard of anyone in the Church who considers that God can be frivolous. We believe that God is absolute perfection and it would "seem" that logically frivolity and "absolute" perfection could not co-exist. Assuming that to be true; then an "accepted fact" would seem to be the logical conclusion.
Don't mis-understand me; I certainly don't claim to be any kind of "expert" in any area; I am only expressing my own opinions. It can be fun as well as stimulating to "speculate" on various ideas and see how others think.

Let me put it another way. Things like "purpose" or "reason" are human concepts, ways in which we attempt to explain our actions. God does not need to have a purpose or a reason for things He does. The fact that whatever he does is the will of God is reason enough, and certainly cannot be termed frivolous.

I am also not convinced that God is required to follow rules of logic. :wink:

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 20:24 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

I think the Regensburg Lecture is of some relevance here.


Quote:
The Holy Father posed the fundamental question that lies behind all the discussion about war and terror. If God is Logos, it means that a norm of reason follows from what God is. Things are, because they have natures and are intended to be the way they are because God is what he is: He has his own inner order.

If God is not Logos but "Will," as most Muslim thinkers hold Allah to be, it means that, for them, Logos places a "limit" on Allah. He cannot do everything because he cannot do both evil and good. He cannot do contradictories.

Thus, if we want to "worship" Allah, it means we must be able to make what is evil good or what is good evil. That is, we can do whatever is said to be the "will" of Allah, even if it means doing violence as if it were "reasonable."

Otherwise, we would "limit" the "power" of Allah. This is what the Pope meant about making violence "reasonable." This different conception of the Godhead constitutes the essential difference between Christianity and Islam, both in their concept of worship and of science.



http://www.zenit.org/article-17818?l=english

Quote:
Aquinas says that truth is the "conformity of the mind with reality." This means that a reality exists that we do not ourselves make. It is a reality that cannot be "otherwise" by our own will. It also means that God established what is, not we ourselves.

Thus, if we are to know the "truth," which is what makes us "free," it means that we know what God created, is what it is. We rejoice to know the truth that we did not make. The wonder of what is, elates us.

If Allah is pure will, then anything that is, can be the opposite of what it is, so that nothing really is what it is. It can always be otherwise.



Other relevant links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regensburg_lecture

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/bened ... rg_en.html

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 13:42 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 07:34
Posts: 125
Location: Central Florida
LASaxman wrote:
philosophicallyfrank wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
philosophicallyfrank wrote:
I believe that it is an accepted fact (??) that God does nothing for no reason; that there is a purpose for everything that He does.

I'm not sure that is an "accepted fact". And God certainly does not need to explain or justify His actions.

Hi Dave,
While there are a lot of things that I have never heard of; I haven't heard of anyone in the Church who considers that God can be frivolous. We believe that God is absolute perfection and it would "seem" that logically frivolity and "absolute" perfection could not co-exist. Assuming that to be true; then an "accepted fact" would seem to be the logical conclusion.
Don't mis-understand me; I certainly don't claim to be any kind of "expert" in any area; I am only expressing my own opinions. It can be fun as well as stimulating to "speculate" on various ideas and see how others think.

Let me put it another way. Things like "purpose" or "reason" are human concepts, ways in which we attempt to explain our actions. God does not need to have a purpose or a reason for things He does. The fact that whatever he does is the will of God is reason enough, and certainly cannot be termed frivolous.

I am also not convinced that God is required to follow rules of logic. :wink:


Hi Dave,
I'm going to really get in over my head on these.

Regarding "purpose" and "reason"; did God "always" have in mind creating our universe and us or did He come-up with the idea at a later time??? Is God a "static" entity or a "flexible/thinking" entity? When He accomplished His creation; He had a plan for us and it's "purpose/reason" was to allow us to know, love, serve and be with Him for eternity. There was a "purpose/reason" for Him to give us "free will"; so that we would come to Him voluntarily.

I may well be drawing the wrong implication from what you said; but, for more precision, let me substitute "evil" for "frivolous". Based on what you said; it "seems" to imply that God "could" do that which is evil; but, "wills" not to do so. However, is it not more correct to say that God "can not" do that which is evil due to His state of absolute perfection?

As for Logic, it's not that God is "required" to follow it's rules; but, that in His state of absolute perfection; He is Logic. (That probably isn't phrased the best)

Frank

_________________
Frank Russell
The more you learn; the more you learn that there is to learn!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 15:13 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15612
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Frank,

Evil and good are not things that exist apart from God; things that God can choose between. Just look at the word "good". The fact that it bears a close resemblance to the word "God" is no accident. Whatever God wills is good by definition.

As to logic, what is the foundational premise of logic? It is that "something cannot be and not be at the same time." How does that apply to a spiritual being who exists outside of time? It doesn't. If you remove the element of time that statement is nonsensical.

Now, :tsk: I am not much of a philosopher, so I'm sure someone will come along and correct me.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 15:16 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2004 14:47
Posts: 1564
LASaxman wrote:

Just look at the word "good".The fact that it bears a close resemblance to the word "God" is no accident. Whatever God wills is good by definition.


Maybe that works in English ... but not in all languages. :wink:

_________________
squirt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jamais le mal n’aura le dernier mot. La foi et l’amour déplacent les montagnes de la haine.
- Marguerite (Maggy) Barankitse


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 15:22 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15612
Location: Los Angeles, CA
squirt wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
Just look at the word "good".The fact that it bears a close resemblance to the word "God" is no accident. Whatever God wills is good by definition.

Maybe that works in English ... but not in all languages. :wink:

Well Squirt, I said I'm not a philosopher, I am also not a linguist, nor an etymologist (and I had to look that word up :oops: ).

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 15:32 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2004 14:47
Posts: 1564
LASaxman wrote:
squirt wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
Just look at the word "good".The fact that it bears a close resemblance to the word "God" is no accident. Whatever God wills is good by definition.

Maybe that works in English ... but not in all languages. :wink:

Well Squirt, I said I'm not a philosopher, I am also not a linguist, nor an etymologist (and I had to look that word up :oops: ).


Nevertheless, you raise an interesting philosophical question. When God willed the extermination of peoples occupying the 'promised land' in the Old Testament, for example, was that by definition 'good'?

I wish I had a better memory so I could provide a source, ... but these types of issues have been debated by many philosophers and theologians.

_________________
squirt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jamais le mal n’aura le dernier mot. La foi et l’amour déplacent les montagnes de la haine.
- Marguerite (Maggy) Barankitse


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2013 15:24 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
Squirt,

Quote:
Maybe that works in English ... but not in all languages.


You beat me to it. It is simply a quirk of the English language. It holds good in neither Latin nor Ancient Greek.

I'm reminded of a number of sermons I've heard during which the priest has made much of the "us" in "And God said let us make Man" - proof of the Holy Trinity, no less. Um, no. That the word Elohim happens to be gramatically plural is simply a quirk of Hebrew. No significance should be read into it. (Mind you, it does make the Shema Yisrael particularly beautiful in a very striking way.)

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group