Catholic Online Forum

The first interactive Catholic Forum on the web
It is currently 22 May 2013 07:01

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Unintended Consequences
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 10:47 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2002 11:50
Posts: 18871
Location: USA
Many cities around the state of Florida have gone to "Red Light Cameras" to record motorists running through a Red light. Expressed intention...cut down on side collision accidents, early results successful. Secondary intent increase revenue through fines...early results somewhat successful.

Unintended results a 44% increase in rear end collisions in Saint Petersburg. :roll:

_________________
Bob C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 11:14 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2781
BobC wrote:
Many cities around the state of Florida have gone to "Red Light Cameras" to record motorists running through a Red light. Expressed intention...cut down on side collision accidents, early results successful. Secondary intent increase revenue through fines...early results somewhat successful.

Unintended results a 44% increase in rear end collisions in Saint Petersburg. :roll:


I've driven in the Cape Canaveral/Cocoa Beach and Clearwater/St. Pete areas a lot and I'm surprised there aren't record numbers of accidents! The hodge-podge of elderly drivers from all over the North each with their own rules of the road creates near chaos. The rear-end accident increase does seem to universal, we have the same problem here; non-attentive drivers.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 11:16 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15604
Location: Los Angeles, CA
The City of Los Angeles recently abandoned its Red Light Camera program. I'm not sure what the reasons were.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 11:38 
Online
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 05 Sep 2002 16:11
Posts: 8619
Location: Eastern NC
They've pretty much stopped using them in NC. People kept filing lawsuits to challenge the pictures, and the cost of those cameras became significantly higher than they were bringing in.

_________________
Rose West
"May God help us not to spoil His work" (Bl. Mother Theresa)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 11:43 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2781
Keep adding more in the Denver area, must be profitable. Some drivers are so shy about the cameras that they stop too far behind the line and don't get their turn signal, aggravating to be behind them.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2012 19:29 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7741
Location: Los Angeles, California
David L,

The city stopped but whatever entity that controls the traffic lights at the metro lines (county? I know it's the sheriff's that patrol, not LAPD) have not. I got a red light ticket for precisely the reason Bob mentioned...I would have had to slam on my brakes to avoid going through the light and someone was on my tail. The camera showed I was going exactly the speed limit and the light turned yellow and then it seemed like it was immediately red. I read up on it and that camera is the oldest one used and they discontinued it quite a while back because of timing problems or accuracy problems...forget which. Another time, at the same light, it turned yellow when I was just at the cross walk and I came to a screeching halt. A whole bunch of people at the light all turned an looked at me like I was crazy but I wasn't going to get another ticket I considered unfair.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 15:39 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
Bob C,

Here in Sydney a quick Google search will give you a dozen sites with a full map of the location of every red light camera in the Sydney metrop area. Even the web site of the government department responsible has a full listing that can be downloaded in PDF format. That being so, I'm not sure I see the point.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 16:03 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2002 11:50
Posts: 18871
Location: USA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Bob C,

Here in Sydney a quick Google search will give you a dozen sites with a full map of the location of every red light camera in the Sydney metrop area. Even the web site of the government department responsible has a full listing that can be downloaded in PDF format. That being so, I'm not sure I see the point.


What do you not see the point of? The Red Light Cameras, or the identifying of all the sites?

_________________
Bob C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 16:11 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
Bob,

If you're going to tell people where they are, what's the point?

We don't tell people "Next Saturdasy night there will be a random breath testing unit a hundred metres down the road from the Such-and-such pub". People who've been drinking to excess would simply make a detour around the RBT unit's location.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 16:19 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2002 11:50
Posts: 18871
Location: USA
Quote:
We don't tell people "Next Saturdasy night there will be a random breath testing unit a hundred metres down the road from the Such-and-such pub". People who've been drinking to excess would simply make a detour around the RBT unit's location.


The courts here have mandated that there be some form of public notice when the local police intend to do a sobriety check point, and their location.

Usually the location is on an approach to a bridge where turning around will get you chased and tested anyway. I almost never drink while out, and the most I ever have is a single beer with dinner, so those stops don't bother me.

_________________
Bob C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 16:41 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2781
BobC wrote:
Quote:
We don't tell people "Next Saturdasy night there will be a random breath testing unit a hundred metres down the road from the Such-and-such pub". People who've been drinking to excess would simply make a detour around the RBT unit's location.


The courts here have mandated that there be some form of public notice when the local police intend to do a sobriety check point, and their location.

Usually the location is on an approach to a bridge where turning around will get you chased and tested anyway. I almost never drink while out, and the most I ever have is a single beer with dinner, so those stops don't bother me.


In the Denver area they announce they will be conducting DUI checkpoint stops but they don't announce the locations. I don't drink at all, did my share when I was young, but I have never been stopped; I'm rarely out late at night when the stops are most prevalent.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 19:24 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: 05 Oct 2008 20:28
Posts: 1611
Location: Dorchester, MA, USA
BobC wrote:
The courts here have mandated that there be some form of public notice when the local police intend to do a sobriety check point, and their location.


Speed traps, too.

I just spent some time in NJ over the past week. One of the stories in the news is the continuing saga of the red light cameras and court challenges. There are specific requirements as to calibration, record-keeping, etc... The locations would have to be a matter of public record.

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 19:30 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15604
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Here in Sydney a quick Google search will give you a dozen sites with a full map of the location of every red light camera in the Sydney metrop area. Even the web site of the government department responsible has a full listing that can be downloaded in PDF format. That being so, I'm not sure I see the point.

Here in California there is a legal requirement that a sign be posted certain distance from the intersection indicating the presence of the red-light camera. If the sign is not posted it is grounds to get the ticket dismissed.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 19:33 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
Rob,

Quote:
Speed traps, too.



Experience here has shown them to be problematic - they've been known to clock stationary objects as travelling at very high speeds. There's been some debate about whether it's the fault of the equipment or the people operating it.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 19:34 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

Quote:
Here in California there is a legal requirement that a sign be posted certain distance from the intersection indicating the presence of the red-light camera.


Which seems to me to be pointless.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 19:38 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15604
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
David,

Quote:
Here in California there is a legal requirement that a sign be posted certain distance from the intersection indicating the presence of the red-light camera.


Which seems to me to be pointless.

Well, they still catch a lot of people. Illiterates perhaps?

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 19:46 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

Complete morons would be more accurate.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 20:21 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15604
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
David,

Complete morons would be more accurate.

Well, I got caught once, :oops: :roll:

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 20:32 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

Okay, why - when you saw the warning sign as you approached - did you not simply make a detour around that particular intersection?

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2012 21:52 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15604
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
David,

Okay, why - when you saw the warning sign as you approached - did you not simply make a detour around that particular intersection?

The signs are not that far from the intersection. In order to make a detour you would have to make a (probably illegal) U-turn.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 00:14 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5278
Location: Europe
Well, the Greeks and Cypriots took great exception to these cameras so the Greeks burned theirs up and the Cypriots smashed theirs up.
The unintended consequence was that the photos caught girlfriends or boyfriends in cars with married people, and caused all sorts of problems. :roll:

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 07:57 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2002 11:50
Posts: 18871
Location: USA
Quote:
The unintended consequence was that the photos caught girlfriends or boyfriends in cars with married people, and caused all sorts of problems.


Different type cameras, those are surveillance, the red light cameras are triggered as a snap shot when someone blows through the intersection on a red light.

_________________
Bob C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 12:41 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2781
BobC wrote:
Quote:
The unintended consequence was that the photos caught girlfriends or boyfriends in cars with married people, and caused all sorts of problems.


Different type cameras, those are surveillance, the red light cameras are triggered as a snap shot when someone blows through the intersection on a red light.


Don't the Red Light cameras photograph the driver? The images I've seen on the local news clearly show the driver and anyone in the passenger seat.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 15:10 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 08 Jan 2006 12:20
Posts: 3262
Location: USA, West of the Mississippi
BobC wrote:
Many cities around the state of Florida have gone to "Red Light Cameras" to record motorists running through a Red light. Expressed intention...cut down on side collision accidents, early results successful. Secondary intent increase revenue through fines...early results somewhat successful.

Unintended results a 44% increase in rear end collisions in Saint Petersburg. :roll:


In our community the interest in revenue for the ticketing by camera was so high, the lights suddenly began to have VERY short yellow lights causing an increase of all sorts of collisions. Our community voted the blasted things back out.

It was horrible, if the light went yellow, it often went red almost instantly. Totally violated the statistical rules on how long the yellow needs to be to minimize accidents.

Then there was the constant tinkering with the light lengths, and one day I was almost t-boned as I went through MY green light. The woman was swearing at me, almost hadn't managed to stop, and she ALSO had a green light, so the timing had been so far off that a very busy intersection was having serious errors. I called 911 and had a FIT about the light being green both ways. It was fixed.

I'm totally against the cameras because there will always be the temptation for the city to change the lights to make for more tickets.

_________________
K. Ann Seeton

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." --Aristotle (but the concept is found in John Paul II's books The Acting Person and Love and Responsibility as well.)


Quicksilver to Gold
http://hg2au.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 19:13 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7741
Location: Los Angeles, California
K. Ann,

Quote:
It was horrible, if the light went yellow, it often went red almost instantly. Totally violated the statistical rules on how long the yellow needs to be to minimize accidents.


That's exactly what happened to me.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2012 19:15 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7741
Location: Los Angeles, California
James,

Quote:
David,

Complete morons would be more accurate.


My understanding of the purpose of the signs is that people will therefore be less inclined to drive improperly knowing they may get a ticket up ahead. The cameras are in plain sight.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2013 14:57 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

Quote:
In order to make a detour you would have to make a (probably illegal) U-turn.


If the warning sign is posted in such a manner that by the time you see it you haven't time to respond, then it can hardly be said to be a warning in any proper sense of the word.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2013 15:08 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
Val,

Well, from this thread it would seem there are at least three possibilities here. The purpose of the red light cameras is so that

i) the relevant local authorities are able to detect and punish offenders;
ii) knowing they are about, people will drive in a safer manner;
iii) to raise revenue.

My objections

i) If you know they're there, you won't offend (unless you're a moron).
ii) Ditto.
iii) If you're local authority is so strapped for cash that this is the best they can think of to raise revenue, red light cameras are probably the least of your immediate worries.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2013 16:41 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
Oops,

iii) If your local authority...

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2013 02:13 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15604
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
David,

Quote:
In order to make a detour you would have to make a (probably illegal) U-turn.


If the warning sign is posted in such a manner that by the time you see it you haven't time to respond, then it can hardly be said to be a warning in any proper sense of the word.

It gives you enough time to decide not to try to make it through on the yellow.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2013 05:05 
Online
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 05 Sep 2002 16:11
Posts: 8619
Location: Eastern NC
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Val,

Well, from this thread it would seem there are at least three possibilities here. The purpose of the red light cameras is so that

i) the relevant local authorities are able to detect and punish offenders;
ii) knowing they are about, people will drive in a safer manner;
iii) to raise revenue.

My objections

i) If you know they're there, you won't offend (unless you're a moron).
ii) Ditto.
iii) If you're local authority is so strapped for cash that this is the best they can think of to raise revenue, red light cameras are probably the least of your immediate worries.


Number ii is extremely relevant and a worthy cause, and your objection to it is actually the desired result. Should the purpose of law be to "catch" people, or to guide them into behaviors that are better for everyone?

The intent in a town local to me was to prevent car crashes. I mean serious, catastrophic, fatal car crashes occurring when people were driving 50-70 miles/hour in the middle of a highly urban area during high-traffic times of day, more than once or twice a year. So the cameras were put up in the intersections with the worst accidents, and it was all very public and clear what was happening, and people either did their joyriding elsewhere or they slowed down, at least at the intersections.

And insofar as there haven't been any such crashes in the several years since the cameras went up, those cameras did their job even though they're not there any more.

_________________
Rose West
"May God help us not to spoil His work" (Bl. Mother Theresa)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2013 14:33 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
Rose,

I mean that if people are forewarned of the presence of the camera, they will drive properly as they approach it and then return to their usual bad habits once they have passed through the intersection.

Now, if the location of the cameras were kept secret...

I'm simply suggesting that the cameras should be deployed in the same manner as RBT units - random locations, frequently moved. If people know they could be caught anywhere and at anytime, they will probably drive as they ought - responsibly, soberly and carefully.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2013 15:08 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2781
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Rose,

I mean that if people are forewarned of the presence of the camera, they will drive properly as they approach it and then return to their usual bad habits once they have passed through the intersection.

Now, if the location of the cameras were kept secret...

I'm simply suggesting that the cameras should be deployed in the same manner as RBT units - random locations, frequently moved. If people know they could be caught anywhere and at anytime, they will probably drive as they ought - responsibly, soberly and carefully.


Too difficult to calibrate the Red Light cameras if portable; the proximity of the auto to the stop line must be recorded with a fair degree of precision in order for the citation to hold up in court. The cameras and flash assemblies are usually mounted several feet off the ground and across the intersection from the stop line in question to get the best view. We do have mobile speed cameras because they require no exotic site calibration. My GPS actually warns me about a block ahead if there is a camera intersection coming up.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2013 18:20 
Online
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 05 Sep 2002 16:11
Posts: 8619
Location: Eastern NC
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Rose,

I mean that if people are forewarned of the presence of the camera, they will drive properly as they approach it and then return to their usual bad habits once they have passed through the intersection.

Now, if the location of the cameras were kept secret...

I'm simply suggesting that the cameras should be deployed in the same manner as RBT units - random locations, frequently moved. If people know they could be caught anywhere and at anytime, they will probably drive as they ought - responsibly, soberly and carefully.


That may be.

My point is that the desired result, safer intersections and fewer speed-related fatalities, was achieved as the law stood. It would seem that the extent you would go to is unnecessary.

_________________
Rose West
"May God help us not to spoil His work" (Bl. Mother Theresa)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2013 19:12 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4937
Rose West wrote:
My point is that the desired result, safer intersections and fewer speed-related fatalities, was achieved as the law stood. It would seem that the extent you would go to is unnecessary.


I agree, the intent of driving laws and the legitimate authority to regulate driving is premised upon public safety -promoting the common good -protecting lives.

There is and should be a limit as to how invasive government can become in its zeal to protect us from harm.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Jan 2013 19:10 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14661
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
A Queensland teenager is expected to be charged with drink driving after crashing into the David Jones department store in Sydney's CBD.

Police were carrying out random breath tests on Elizabeth Street earlier this morning when they noticed a driver make a sudden turn to avoid them.

Acting Inspector Andrew Biasi says officers became suspicious of the 17-year-old boy when he made a sudden turn into Park Street.

He says police followed him with their lights and sirens on.

"The vehicle continued where it attempted to turn right to travel in an easterly direction on Market Street," Inspector Biasi said.

"In doing so the vehicle has mounted the curb and crashed into the corner of the David Jones department store.

"The driver who was the sole occupant of the vehicle has then run from the scene, he was arrested shortly after by police."




http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-13/c ... op/4462688

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2013 09:15 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2781
dlm wrote:
Rose West wrote:
My point is that the desired result, safer intersections and fewer speed-related fatalities, was achieved as the law stood. It would seem that the extent you would go to is unnecessary.


I agree, the intent of driving laws and the legitimate authority to regulate driving is premised upon public safety -promoting the common good -protecting lives.

There is and should be a limit as to how invasive government can become in its zeal to protect us from harm.


Laws are only effective for those who choose to obey them. I have noticed over the past decade a tremendous increase in red-light and stop sign runners, speeders and general neglect of the most basic rules of the road such as using turn signals and right-of-way. An increasingly large population have realized there is only a slim chance of getting caught for a traffic violation and have joined the population that only obeys laws if there is a threat of getting caught. Expect an increase in unmanned traffic-control devices, the chance to earn added revenue is too great and the increasing supply of violators too inviting.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: retsinab and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group