Catholic Online Forum

The first interactive Catholic Forum on the web
It is currently 19 May 2013 21:48

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012 22:26 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5271
Location: Europe
A Catholic charity which feeds poor people in Arizona recently turned down a couple thousand dollars from Walmart, saying they would consider it blood money.
This is actually old news, but I keep wondering about whether they were right or not? How --- in Catholic moral theology-- do you work out whether this was the correct thing to do?

Story links:
http://azstarnet.com/business/local/cas ... Wr0.reddit
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... lmart.html

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012 22:45 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7735
Location: Los Angeles, California
Grace,

Well, since this is chew and chat and not doctrine, I'm going to just wildly speculate without any foundation in reality.

I despise Wal-Mart and won't shop there but they're not the mafia and it's a bit much to call it "blood money". Does Casa Maria do a background check on every donor? Do they check to see if the wealthy businessman who donates has a fair workplace? Did they do a study on Wal-Mart's salaries compared with local salaries? They say they shop at Costco and Costco has a special niche that is different than Wal-Mart so in some ways, not as likely to put certain small businesses out of business but they are a non-union store. I don't know if they're anti-union, from what I understand they're known as a good place to work.

It's futile gesture, and this is where my wild speculation is going to come into play, I don't know that Casa Maria knew that the policies of Wal-Mart are intrinsically evil, they're just unhappy with some of their practices and have a political bias (and I'm not judging whether it's right or wrong) in favor of businesses that are pro union (except Costco apparently) so I don't see it as justified to refuse money to feed people. End of wild speculation.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012 23:33 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15598
Location: Los Angeles, CA
I think they have a right to accept or reject donations from anyone according to their own judgement, just as a donor has the right to choose what charity they will donate to.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012 23:42 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5271
Location: Europe
Hi, Val! Thanks for your response. Yeah, I think that was my gut reaction, too. Just take the money and use it to feed people.
I think (but I haven't searched) Mother Teresa took some donation from a questionable source, there was some controversy, and she didn't return it.

However, from what I can find online (looking at the website of Casa Maria, etc) this guy looks like the real deal-- a genuine Catholic walking the walk and living selflessly to serve people -- so.... I found myself trying to understand.

I thought of putting this topic in Doctrine, but wasn't sure. This is more trying to figure out how to apply doctrine when faced with a moral dilemma than it is straight doctrine. This story intrigues me I guess because we often face these odd situations in real life and wonder what to do.

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 00:22 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4921
Arwen wrote:
A Catholic charity which feeds poor people in Arizona recently turned down a couple thousand dollars from Walmart, saying they would consider it blood money.
This is actually old news, but I keep wondering about whether they were right or not? How --- in Catholic moral theology-- do you work out whether this was the correct thing to do?

Story links:
http://azstarnet.com/business/local/cas ... Wr0.reddit
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... lmart.html



They sound more like a political charity than a Catholic charity.

I will have to read thoroughly the recent Apostolic Letter issued “Motu Proprio” On the Service of Charity, 11 November 2012 which was issued to begin putting an end to the leftist hijacking of Catholic charity efforts and see how this charity fits.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 00:42 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5271
Location: Europe
LASaxman wrote:
I think they have a right to accept or reject donations from anyone according to their own judgement, just as a donor has the right to choose what charity they will donate to.

But how does a Catholic make that judgement, that is my question. What takes precedence in deciding?

dlm wrote:
They sound more like a political charity than a Catholic charity.
Here is their website: http://www.casamariatucson.org/
It looks very good to me. Doesn't look political.

Quote:
I will have to read thoroughly the recent Apostolic Letter issued “Motu Proprio” On the Service of Charity, 11 November 2012 which was issued to begin putting an end to the leftist hijacking of Catholic charity efforts and see how this charity fits.
I will be interested in your observations.

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 01:58 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 20:47
Posts: 3578
Location: Southwestern PA
I seem to recall something about a gift horse and a big mouth. God works in mysterious ways. Who is to say that this is NOT God working to help people help others, Didn't Jesus remind us to help the poor? Take the money and use it where it will do the most good, and don't make it into rocket science cause it ain't.

_________________
Pax et Bonum


Schultzz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 04:01 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5271
Location: Europe
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Take the money and use it where it will do the most good, and don't make it into rocket science cause it ain't.

If you were running a Catholic charity, would you accept a donation from Planned Parenthood? Is there anywhere you would draw the line?

I realise you may object, saying that PP would never donate money to a Catholic soup kitchen, so how about a hypothetical, well-known local abortionist? Is it okay to accept money from him?

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 04:15 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 20:47
Posts: 3578
Location: Southwestern PA
Jesus came to save sinners. He dined with tax collectors and others who were considered like planned parenthood and/or worse. Believe me, the money doesn't care where it's been or where it's going. If it is going to help people why should you care who donates it or why. Perhaps someone has seen the light perhaps they haven't. Sometimes people amaze me by thinking the donated money gets tainted because a sinner donated it. Take the giant redwood tree out of your eye first, then put that money to good use. Help someone with it. Go plant a tree with it. When you are dead and gone it will be too late to help someone. It's the "us" and "them' syndrome. The "us" are in their fort. Of course they feel they are much better than those miserable sinners "them". As long as it's "us" in our fort why should we care about "them"? Giant redwoods little specks. This logic is too simple. Let's make it complicated.

_________________
Pax et Bonum


Schultzz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 04:23 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 20:47
Posts: 3578
Location: Southwestern PA
Asked whether it was responsible to decline $2,000 that could help the people Casa Maria serves, Flagg defended his decision and said he consulted with the charity's board members.

"The consensus was not to accept the money," he said. "Hopefully we're modeling good Catholic, Christian behavior."

Still, he admitted that the donation would have been harder to turn down had the amount been more.

Casa Maria's annual budget is $200,000, and it serves an average of 500 people a day.

Quote:
"I live in the real world," Flagg said. "It would be a whole different situation if it was $200,000."

What about the principle of the matter
?

"It is about the principle," Flagg said, "but it'd be harder to resist $200,000. I'm just being real with you." Yeah, a REAL hypocrite!

_________________
Pax et Bonum


Schultzz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 04:33 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2002 11:50
Posts: 18836
Location: USA
IMO, A charity has the right to accept or reject donations as it chooses. Having said that, after reading the two articles you posted the guy who runs the Charity seems to have an ox to gore with WalMart.

_________________
Bob C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 07:28 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2762
Arwen wrote:
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Take the money and use it where it will do the most good, and don't make it into rocket science cause it ain't.

If you were running a Catholic charity, would you accept a donation from Planned Parenthood? Is there anywhere you would draw the line?

I realise you may object, saying that PP would never donate money to a Catholic soup kitchen, so how about a hypothetical, well-known local abortionist? Is it okay to accept money from him?


I was fine with all this Walmart bashing until the comparison with Planned Parenthood! Are you kidding? Whether you like Walmart or not it and Dollar Stores etc. are the only places many can afford to shop and it so because Walmart and the like have the guts to stand up to the union thieves and thugs.

A charity has an obligation to accomplish a goal be it feeding or providing services to the needy; it has no right to inject a personal opinion about a donor, a legitimate, law-abiding donor I might add, to the detriment of its stated goal. It is the people we should be caring for not some off-base, half-baked political ideology.

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 07:53 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2004 07:39
Posts: 8523
Location: Northern VA, USA
bali wrote:
Arwen wrote:
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Take the money and use it where it will do the most good, and don't make it into rocket science cause it ain't.

If you were running a Catholic charity, would you accept a donation from Planned Parenthood? Is there anywhere you would draw the line?

I realise you may object, saying that PP would never donate money to a Catholic soup kitchen, so how about a hypothetical, well-known local abortionist? Is it okay to accept money from him?


I was fine with all this Walmart bashing until the comparison with Planned Parenthood! Are you kidding? Whether you like Walmart or not it and Dollar Stores etc. are the only places many can afford to shop and it so because Walmart and the like have the guts to stand up to the union thieves and thugs.

He was trying to illustrate that sometimes you have to refuse money based on where it comes from. He was refuting your point that you have to accept money from wherever it comes from.

I'm explaining this because your statement was not addressing his point, leading me to suspect you did not understand the point he was trying to make.

_________________
ImageJeff StevensImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 10:06 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2762
Kardinal wrote:
bali wrote:
Arwen wrote:
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Take the money and use it where it will do the most good, and don't make it into rocket science cause it ain't.

If you were running a Catholic charity, would you accept a donation from Planned Parenthood? Is there anywhere you would draw the line?

I realise you may object, saying that PP would never donate money to a Catholic soup kitchen, so how about a hypothetical, well-known local abortionist? Is it okay to accept money from him?


I was fine with all this Walmart bashing until the comparison with Planned Parenthood! Are you kidding? Whether you like Walmart or not it and Dollar Stores etc. are the only places many can afford to shop and it so because Walmart and the like have the guts to stand up to the union thieves and thugs.

He was trying to illustrate that sometimes you have to refuse money based on where it comes from. He was refuting your point that you have to accept money from wherever it comes from.

I'm explaining this because your statement was not addressing his point, leading me to suspect you did not understand the point he was trying to make.


I think this clearly addresses the issue: " it has no right to inject a personal opinion about a donor, a legitimate, law-abiding donor I might add, to the detriment of its stated goal"

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 10:22 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7735
Location: Los Angeles, California
Jeff,

Quote:
I'm explaining this because your statement was not addressing his point, leading me to suspect you did not understand the point he was trying to make.


He wasn't just trying to make a point though he did so, he said he was acting on a particular principle and as a Catholic charity anyone reading the article would assume that this is a principle that any Catholic would have applied in this way. In his view, it was indeed what any Catholic should do. The question is this particular donation coming from this particular entity.

Grace broadened the debate by bringing in other examples that use entities that are very clearly and unequivocally in violation of basic Catholic principles. That is not true of Wal-Mart which is why I believe it's more a political statement and not a statement about Catholic principles as he tried to present it.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 10:24 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15598
Location: Los Angeles, CA
bali wrote:
I think this clearly addresses the issue: " it has no right to inject a personal opinion about a donor, a legitimate, law-abiding donor I might add, to the detriment of its stated goal"

Why do they have no right? I would say they have every right to do so, and you have no authority to deny them that right. :roll:

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 10:25 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7735
Location: Los Angeles, California
Schultzz,

You make a good point. However, I think in the cases that Grace added, the issue would then become whether or not accepting the donation would cause scandal and become an opportunity to paint the Church as hypocrites.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 10:27 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 21:49
Posts: 7735
Location: Los Angeles, California
David L,

I agree with you on that point, they have every right to do so but on the other hand, I'm not sure that they have a right to present it as a principle involving Catholic theology as that is questionable if that is what they are doing.

_________________
Valerie Garcia
vals1990@yahoo.com

"Listen, O my son, to the precepts of thy master, and incline the ear of thy heart, and cheerfully receive and faithfully execute the admonitions of thy loving Father, that by the toil of obedience thou mayest return to Him ....." St. Benedict


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 11:09 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15598
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Val wrote:
David L,

I agree with you on that point, they have every right to do so but on the other hand, I'm not sure that they have a right to present it as a principle involving Catholic theology as that is questionable if that is what they are doing.

As pointed out by Grace, in some cases (e.g., PP) the the conflict is more clear cut than others. When it is not so clear cut it becomes a matter of prudential judgement.

The Church certainly supports the rights of workers to earn a just wage, have good working conditions, and to organize. Then there are other matters - does Walmart sell contraceptives? Porn? Do they support other questionable causes and organizations like PP, Susan G. Koman, or certain politicians?

So, I think this group is excercising their judgement, which may differ from Schultz, Bob, or others.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 11:19 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2004 07:39
Posts: 8523
Location: Northern VA, USA
bali wrote:
Kardinal wrote:
bali wrote:
Arwen wrote:
SCHULTZZKOPF wrote:
Take the money and use it where it will do the most good, and don't make it into rocket science cause it ain't.

If you were running a Catholic charity, would you accept a donation from Planned Parenthood? Is there anywhere you would draw the line?

I realise you may object, saying that PP would never donate money to a Catholic soup kitchen, so how about a hypothetical, well-known local abortionist? Is it okay to accept money from him?


I was fine with all this Walmart bashing until the comparison with Planned Parenthood! Are you kidding? Whether you like Walmart or not it and Dollar Stores etc. are the only places many can afford to shop and it so because Walmart and the like have the guts to stand up to the union thieves and thugs.

He was trying to illustrate that sometimes you have to refuse money based on where it comes from. He was refuting your point that you have to accept money from wherever it comes from.

I'm explaining this because your statement was not addressing his point, leading me to suspect you did not understand the point he was trying to make.


I think this clearly addresses the issue: " it has no right to inject a personal opinion about a donor, a legitimate, law-abiding donor I might add, to the detriment of its stated goal"

Then you would say that they should accept money from Planned Parenthood. Just claifying.

_________________
ImageJeff StevensImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 11:21 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2004 07:39
Posts: 8523
Location: Northern VA, USA
LASaxman wrote:
The Church certainly supports the rights of workers to earn a just wage, have good working conditions, and to organize.

Impossible. That would mean that the Church supports union thieves and thugs.

_________________
ImageJeff StevensImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 11:49 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15711
Location: Southern California, Catholic
Arwen wrote:
...
If you were running a Catholic charity, would you accept a donation from Planned Parenthood? Is there anywhere you would draw the line?...
I suspect that several Catholic Charities would. :(
See Pro-life leaders praise Pope for ‘huge move’ of ordering Catholic Church charities to be Catholic
Quote:
...Pope Benedict XVI’s directive called ‘On the service of charity’ released Saturday which mandated (ordered) that charitable activities undertaken by the Catholic Church never offend Catholic teaching....

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 15:29 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15598
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Kardinal wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
The Church certainly supports the rights of workers to earn a just wage, have good working conditions, and to organize.

Impossible. That would mean that the Church supports union thieves and thugs.

:oops: Oops! I must have been thinking of the Southern Baptists. :wink:

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 16:01 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14632
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Art. 1. - § 3. In addition to observing the canonical legislation, the collective charitable initiatives to which this Motu Proprio refers are required to follow Catholic principles in their activity and they may not accept commitments which could in any way affect the observance of those principles.


Quote:
Art. 10. - § 3. In particular, the diocesan Bishop is to ensure that charitable agencies dependent upon him do not receive financial support from groups or institutions that pursue ends contrary to Church’s teaching. Similarly, lest scandal be given to the faithful, the diocesan Bishop is to ensure that these charitable agencies do not accept contributions for initiatives whose ends, or the means used to pursue them, are not in conformity with the Church’s teaching.


http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/bened ... as_en.html

The above provisions take effect as of 10 December 2012.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 16:27 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15711
Location: Southern California, Catholic
If you wonder who the Pope is addressing see CCHD 2011-2012 Grants Report

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 17:06 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15598
Location: Los Angeles, CA
gabriel wrote:
If you wonder who the Pope is addressing see CCHD 2011-2012 Grants Report

But that all has to do with organizations that are receiving grants from CCHD, whereas in the case presented by Grace the money would be flowing in the opposite direction, i.e., into the Catholic charity.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 17:17 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15598
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
Quote:
Art. 1. - § 3. In addition to observing the canonical legislation, the collective charitable initiatives to which this Motu Proprio refers are required to follow Catholic principles in their activity and they may not accept commitments which could in any way affect the observance of those principles.


Quote:
Art. 10. - § 3. In particular, the diocesan Bishop is to ensure that charitable agencies dependent upon him do not receive financial support from groups or institutions that pursue ends contrary to Church’s teaching. Similarly, lest scandal be given to the faithful, the diocesan Bishop is to ensure that these charitable agencies do not accept contributions for initiatives whose ends, or the means used to pursue them, are not in conformity with the Church’s teaching.

What does the phrase "charitable agencies dependent upon him [the bishop]" mean?

I didn't see anything in that news article that indicated whether Casa Maria was sponsored by or sanctioned by the diocese. They call it a "lay Catholic organization".

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 18:35 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4921
Arwen wrote:
dlm wrote:
They sound more like a political charity than a Catholic charity.
Here is their website: http://www.casamariatucson.org/
It looks very good to me. Doesn't look political.


I did some research and it would appear that the Obama campaign used the facility for several social justice community service 'events'. I would guess that the facility was used by the Obama campaign as an avenue to disseminate propaganda to primarily 'poor' Hispanic voters.

As was discussed in the "Catholic Online Forum • Why Do You Think Obama Won?" topic discussion as to why Hispanic Catholics voted overwhelmingly for the party of homosexual sex, abortion, and socialism -they were lied to by the leftists.

It would appear that this 'Catholic' charity took part in the lies.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 18:46 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4921
Kardinal wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
The Church certainly supports the rights of workers to earn a just wage, have good working conditions, and to organize.

Impossible. That would mean that the Church supports union thieves and thugs.


You seem blind to evil?

Do you deny that there are union thieves and thugs that have infiltrated the unions? Or that union leadership has supported the leftist regime now based in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue?

I can myself accept what the Church teaches and as well reject the evil leftists that attempt to hijack the good efforts of men. To do otherwise is to give evil a free pass.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 18:50 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15598
Location: Los Angeles, CA
One of their names might indicate an affiliation with the Catholic Worker movement.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 19:45 
Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2009 15:57
Posts: 2762
Keep in mind Obama is a Chicago politician and has tight political ties to some of the most egregious unions in the country. My experience with unions stems from my father who was a shop steward in a union paper box factory; he got paid by the union when they went on strike although not as much as the bosses but more than the fools on the picket lines. He and I had some pretty terrible arguments over unions and I don't think he ever saw the downside to them or believed they could become too powerful. I always thought it was interesting that the workers usually lost more income during a long strike than they recouped after "negotiations".

_________________
BobA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2012 23:16 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008 23:35
Posts: 5271
Location: Europe
Val wrote:
... they have every right to do so but on the other hand, I'm not sure that they have a right to present it as a principle involving Catholic theology as that is questionable if that is what they are doing.

So does this statement sum up where we are? Is this our conclusion?

Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/bened ... as_en.html

The above provisions take effect as of 10 December 2012.
This seems mostly about making sure Catholic charities do not involve themselves in supporting abortion, doesn't it?

_________________
Grace

As to the past, let us entrust it to God's mercy, the future to Divine Providence. Our task is to live holy the present moment. - Saint Gianna Molla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2012 00:05 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4921
Arwen wrote:
Val wrote:
... they have every right to do so but on the other hand, I'm not sure that they have a right to present it as a principle involving Catholic theology as that is questionable if that is what they are doing.

So does this statement sum up where we are? Is this our conclusion?

Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/bened ... as_en.html

The above provisions take effect as of 10 December 2012.
This seems mostly about making sure Catholic charities do not involve themselves in supporting abortion, doesn't it?


I still digest it; however, in my opinion --this covers far more than that extreme example. It covers all aspects required for authentic charity...

For any interested here is an opinion piece on the matter from Michael Voris (Note: PDF - Adobe Acrobat format):

http://www.churchmilitant.tv/scripts/vort-2012-12-04.pdf

-small excerpt:
Quote:
Papal Frontal Assault

2012-12-04

Hello everyone and welcome to The Vortex where lies and falsehoods are trapped and exposed. I’m Michael Voris.

Every now and then .. Pope Benedict brings out the heavy lumber against abuses. He’s done it with those who would say the Traditional Latin Mass is a thing of the past .. He’s done it with the homosexual priest sex abuse crisis .. he’s done it on the massive lack of proper catechesis on the part of bishops .. he’s done it on liberal, barely still Catholic nuns and now he’s done it against the social justice crowd in the Church that keeps masquerading its liberal modernist agenda under the guise of caring for the poor – which any thinking person knows has been a complete façade for 40 years now.

A short while ago .. he wrote what is officially called a Motu Proprio .. which is Latin for a letter that was written “on his own accord” .. meaning it expresses the mind and heart of the Pope very clearly and came from his pen.

Unofficially .. this one could be called the heavyweight smackdown against the social justice gang roaming the corridors of the Church.

For years now .. faithful Catholics have been pointing to and highlighting massive abuses in the Church’s charitable work where so-called Catholics distribute funds collected from unsuspecting Catholics in the pews and then give that money to groups who directly and indirectly support causes that fly in the face of Catholic teaching.

We here at ChurchMilitant.TV just released last month our Special Report immediately in advance of the US Bishops’ annual collection known as the CCHD .. The Catholic Campaign for Human Development ..which has been rife with abuses for decades.

We’ve attached a link to the program if you would like to see it which spotlights dozens and dozens of such cases like your money going to pro-abortion and pro-same sex marriage groups just to name some of the issues.

Despite boilerplate denials coming from the liberal lay staffers who have manned those offices for years .. and their own fox guarding the hen house internal inspection .. nothing has changed .. with the exception that even MORE anti-Catholic teaching groups have gotten an even larger share of the collection.

Faithful Catholics had had enough. After years and years of complaints being shoved aside and dismissed by more liberal or social justice minded bishops and their staffs both on the diocesan level and the national headquarters in Washington DC .. reports started being transmitted to more friendly ears at the Vatican.

Various private meetings and discussions have been held in the past couple of years not just about the disgraceful situation in America but also in Canada where a mirror of the US problem is plainly visible.

It would appear .. no guarantees .. but in a case of two and two adding up to four .. it would appear that some of those complaints and meetings and discussions have finally found their target .. the Holy Father himself .. who .. politely .. yet nevertheless quite clearly and firmly made known that he is not happy with the abuses and that a new course must be set.

We’ve also attached his Motu Proprio for you to read for yourself which we suggest you take the 10 minutes to do. It is .. frankly .. the most complete and through smackdown of the misunderstanding and misapplication of the Church’s teaching on charity you will find.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2012 01:04 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2004 07:39
Posts: 8523
Location: Northern VA, USA
dlm wrote:
Kardinal wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
The Church certainly supports the rights of workers to earn a just wage, have good working conditions, and to organize.

Impossible. That would mean that the Church supports union thieves and thugs.

You seem blind to evil?

Nice accusation. Yeah, that's exactly what I am. :roll:

_________________
ImageJeff StevensImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2012 02:36 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2003 13:32
Posts: 4921
Kardinal wrote:
dlm wrote:
Kardinal wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
The Church certainly supports the rights of workers to earn a just wage, have good working conditions, and to organize.

Impossible. That would mean that the Church supports union thieves and thugs.

You seem blind to evil?

Nice accusation. Yeah, that's exactly what I am. :roll:


I actually gave you the benefit of any doubt -namely that your tongue and cheek response was NOT simply a disparaging comment to offhandedly ridicule those who actually oppose such evils you seem blind to.

My mind reading abilities are zilch SO I only see what you write.

Feel free to elaborate and if possible answer my questions posted regarding where exactly you are coming from on this issue.

_________________
Daniel

"Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division." -- Luke 12:51


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2012 14:22 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14632
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

Quote:
What does the phrase "charitable agencies dependent upon him [the bishop]" mean?


Catholic charitable agencies usually place themselves at the disposal of the local bishop.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group