Catholic Online Forum

The first interactive Catholic Forum on the web
It is currently 25 May 2013 10:01

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 07:08 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 08 Jul 2008 03:21
Posts: 3247
Location: Georgia
Father Polanski Would Go to Jail

THIS CATHOLIC'S VIEW

By Thomas J. Reese, S.J.

http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfa ... _jail.html

Quote:
Imagine if the Knights of Columbus decided to give an award to a pedophile priest who had fled the country to avoid prison. The outcry would be universal. Victim groups would demand the award be withdrawn and that the organization apologize. Religion reporters would be on the case with the encouragement of their editors. Editorial writers and columnist would denounce the knights as another example of the insensitivity of the Catholic Church to sexual abuse.

And they would all be correct. And I would join them.

But why is there not similar outrage directed at the film industry for giving an award to Roman Polanski, who not only confessed to statutory rape of a 13-year-old girl but fled the country prior to sentencing? Why have film critics and the rest of the media ignored this case for 31 years? He even received an Academy award in 2003. Are the high priests of the entertainment industry immune to criticism?

The president and cultural minister of France, where Polanski has been protected for years, objected when the Swiss arrested Polanski at the Zurich airport when he arrived to attend a film festival at which he was to be honored. Good for the Swiss. Good for the Los Angeles prosecutors who have not given up on this case.

Polanski's defenders, including a 2008 HBO documentary, argue that he should not be punished. They say that the girl was willing and sexually experienced and she has forgiven him (after receiving a settlement). They even cite his tragic childhood and life as an excuse. And besides, it is ancient history.

Such arguments from pedophile priests would be laughed out of court and lambasted by everyone, and rightly so. It makes no difference that the girl is willing and sexually experienced, it is a crime. It is the role of the court, not the victim, to decide who goes to jail and for how long.


It is not as if Polanski is the only Hollywood celebrity to be accused of child abuse. Woody Allen and Michael Jackson come to mind. I am sure that with a little research the media could come up with quite a list. The Catholic Church has rightly been put under a microscope when 4 percent of its priests were involved in abuse, but what about the film industry?

The world has truly changed. Entertainment is the new religion with sex, violence and money the new Trinity. The directors and stars are worshiped and quickly forgiven for any infraction as long as the PR agent is a skilled as a saintly confessor. Entertainment, not religion, is the new opiate of the people and we don't want our supply disturbed.

Is there a double standard here? You bet.

_________________
Rebecca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 07:33 
Offline
Intermediate Member
Intermediate Member
User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 20:47
Posts: 389
I understand. And yet he is a good film maker (sometimes). There are directors on the Vatican Film List who had controversy surrounding their personal lives as well. And if we go back far enough, Da Vinci and Michelangelo weren't exactly shining character studies either.

It doesn't surprise me that the film industry and others (I won't mention France..no need) have taken this stance on Polanski. Hollywood is an ultimate example of secularism. It's about making money. I would expect them to feel this way about the issue.

The Church scandals earlier this decade scarred the church deeply. It hurt its image among both Catholics and non-Catholics as a moral and spiritual voice for the world. Churchmen are supposed to be shepherds held to a higher standard I hope and pray is higher than the culture surrounding it. That's what we as Catholics want and expect from our clergy and that's the way it should be.

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 08:16 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15611
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Well, there certainly have been priests who fled the country to avoid prosecution. I don't know if they have received any awards. They seem to mainly fly below the radar.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 08:29 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2004 07:30
Posts: 10832
Location: Rome, Italy
JMJ

I don't know. I would agree more with Fr. Reese if I didn't know that for years he has been a renown, celebrated dissenter from Catholic doctrine, particularly on the issues that are at the core of the ideological infection that had a great part in creating the problem in the Catholic priesthood.

Under his tenure, America magazine ran blasphemous ads with Our Lady wrapped in condoms and consistently attacked John Paul II and the Card. Ratzinger's CDF on every disciplianry measure and teaching aimed at reaffirming priestly identity and the Catholic doctrine of marriage and sexuality. His articles ridiculing the Church's stance on the ordaining of women, celibacy, homosexuality and criteria for admission to holy orders are often cited on the worst secularist - or pseudo-Catholic - media attacking the Church, and he's invariably among those interviewed when a cheap shot at Pope Benedict and the Catholic Faith is needed to spice up a "brilliant" piece on some secularist rag.

The indulgence Tinsel Town and elitists worldwide are showing to Mr. Polanksy is hardly different from what Fr. Reese and his fellow dissenters have shown to all sorts disloyal theologians, clergy and intellectuals over the course of many years.

Besides, I would be careful with the 4% figure about priests being "involved" in abuse. About that many have been accused of child abuse. According to independent studies (e.g.: John Jay College) between 1950 and 2002 4.392 US priest (out of 109.000) have been investigated, yet those actually found guilty as charged have been about 100 (one hundred). Still too many, and greatly helped by decades of betrayal of clear doctrine and discipline, but not 4% of them. After all Fr. Reese has been among those more active in spreading brazen exaggerations of the rate of priests betraying their wows, and particularly of those with homosexual disorders only to blame abuses on the Catholic view of priesthood and sexuality. He is also an obligatory reading for those who belittle those bigoted Catholics who not only agree with the Catechism and the Pope, but also warn of the increasing anti-Christian drive of our culture and legislation.

Therefore, while there is no doubt that Mr. Polansky deserves to pay for what he did, and then some more, the indignation over this from Fr. Reese puzzles me, even though I might agree with him on the overall. As we learned in school about these situations, Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes. I am sorry, but that's what "a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object" leads me to think. If this is the beginning of a real change on his part instead, then I will be second to none in defending Fr. Reese against all enemies of the Bride of Christ.

_________________
Image FabrizioParty like it's 1773Image Image

No one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist (Pius XI)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 09:34 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2004 07:39
Posts: 8571
Location: Northern VA, USA
Despite Father Reese's record, he makes a good point. Can you imagine Hollywood giving an award to a racist, no matter how good the film? To someone who believe homosexual acts intrinsically disordered? To an anti-Semite? It would never happen.

And if the Church gave an award to a priest who plead GUILTY to sexual contact with someone underage...you'd never hear the end of it.

It really is an excellent illustration of the hypocrisy at work here.

_________________
ImageJeff StevensImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 10:31 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 16:17
Posts: 11524
Location: Enjoying the sight and aroma of blooming lilacs on a marvelous day in May …
Kardinal wrote:
Despite Father Reese's record, he makes a good point. Can you imagine Hollywood giving an award to a racist, no matter how good the film? To someone who believe homosexual acts intrinsically disordered? To an anti-Semite? It would never happen.

And if the Church gave an award to a priest who plead GUILTY to sexual contact with someone underage...you'd never hear the end of it.

It really is an excellent illustration of the hypocrisy at work here,

...there and everywhere!!! :(

_________________
In Christ,

Jim B

I will consider your position if stated with firm, well-thought-out, quiet reasoning. Hateful diatribe, ad hominem attacks and shouted rhetoric don't impress.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 10:51 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 08 Jul 2008 03:21
Posts: 3247
Location: Georgia
Excerpt of commentary from the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights:

Quote:
MAD RUSH TO DEFEND POLANSKI

The Catholic League has long suspected that, in many quarters, the outrage over priestly sexual abuse has had more to do with the status of the accused than the crime itself. Now the evidence is indisputable [. . .]

Actress Debra Winger showed up at the Zurich Film Festival “to honor Roman Polanski as a great artist, but under these sudden and arcane circumstances, we can only think of him today as a human being.” Either that or as a child rapist. She was not alone: the Zurich Film Festival jury proudly displayed red badges reading “Free Polanski.” It was also nice to know that Woody Allen, a man who speaks from experience, came to Polanski’s defense.

Whoopi Goldberg showed off her usual brilliance when she declared that Polanski’s crime “wasn’t rape-rape.” No, only priests are guilty of real rape. Noted photographer Otto Weisser agrees: “He made a little mistake 32 years ago.” That’s right—it’s only a big mistake when priests do it. Richard Cohen of the Washington Post also notes that it’s been “over 30 years” since Polanski molested the girl. Similarly, movie critic Tom O’Neil exclaims that it is “mind-boggling why they’re still pursuing this.” Yet there is no statute of limitations afforded priests—men long dead have been accused of crimes extending back to the 1920s.

Harvey Weinstein is so noble: “We’re calling on every film-maker we can to help fix this terrible situation.” The terrible situation, of course, isn’t what Polanski got away with—it’s his pursuit by the authorities. “To put him on trial or keep him in jail does not serve society in general or his victim in particular,” says journalist Anne Applebaum. She, and others, would carry more weight if the “he” included priests.

No wonder so many Americans look upon the celebrity worshippers with utter disdain. Double that for Catholics.

_________________
Rebecca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 11:38 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2002 11:50
Posts: 18962
Location: USA
Quote:
Can you imagine Hollywood giving an award to a racist, no matter how good the film?


I think that it would depend on the ethnicity of the alleged racist.

While I see much in common between the actions of Polanski and that of the Priests who were convicted. There is one glaring difference. The priests were persons in positions of public trust and moral leadership, Polanski was not.

_________________
Bob C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 12:28 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007 06:29
Posts: 1913
Location: near Orangeville, Ontario
BobC wrote:
While I see much in common between the actions of Polanski and that of the Priests who were convicted. There is one glaring difference. The priests were persons in positions of public trust and moral leadership, Polanski was not.

Bob,
Good point. It really is worse when a priest commits the same crime as someone else. As well as the actual crime, the priest has failed to represent God, has brought the Church into disrepute and likely damaged the faith of many.

_________________
Jayne
"To avoid rash judgment, everyone should be careful to interpret insofar as possible his neighbour's thoughts, words and deeds in a favourable way." CCC 2478


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 12:40 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 12:15
Posts: 11439
Location: State of Michigan, USA
JayneK wrote:
BobC wrote:
While I see much in common between the actions of Polanski and that of the Priests who were convicted. There is one glaring difference. The priests were persons in positions of public trust and moral leadership, Polanski was not.

Bob,
Good point. It really is worse when a priest commits the same crime as someone else. As well as the actual crime, the priest has failed to represent God, has brought the Church into disrepute and likely damaged the faith of many.


It may be worse as far as temporal consequences go, but I doubt that is the cause of the duplicity among Polanski's peers and the media. It's not so much the crime you commit as it is the classification of person who committed it.

_________________
Dean
Most people's sense of history goes back to breakfast time - Benjamin Netanyahu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 12:49 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007 06:29
Posts: 1913
Location: near Orangeville, Ontario
Dean wrote:
It may be worse as far as temporal consequences go, but I doubt that is the cause of the duplicity among Polanski's peers and the media. It's not so much the crime you commit as it is the classification of person who committed it.

Dean,
That does seem to be what is motivating the double standard, but I wonder if at some level they are influenced by the knowledge that it is worse for a priest to do such things.

_________________
Jayne
"To avoid rash judgment, everyone should be careful to interpret insofar as possible his neighbour's thoughts, words and deeds in a favourable way." CCC 2478


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 12:55 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 12:15
Posts: 11439
Location: State of Michigan, USA
JayneK wrote:
Dean wrote:
It may be worse as far as temporal consequences go, but I doubt that is the cause of the duplicity among Polanski's peers and the media. It's not so much the crime you commit as it is the classification of person who committed it.

Dean,
That does seem to be what is motivating the double standard, but I wonder if at some level they are influenced by the knowledge that it is worse for a priest to do such things.


Only if they believe that such behavior is a perversity in the first place. And I'm not convinced that they do believe it. What motivates is whether or not they can get mileage for their own ends out of a scandal, whether it be a good laugh during a "late night" monologue, good revenue from a juicy film, increased readership, or beating down people of faith. Anything that might shine a bright light on their own darkness is to be conveniently ignored.

_________________
Dean
Most people's sense of history goes back to breakfast time - Benjamin Netanyahu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 13:09 
Offline
Proficient Member
Proficient Member

Joined: 11 Sep 2009 10:31
Posts: 959
Location: Roman Catholic (OblateSB)
Dean wrote:

Only if they believe that such behavior is a perversity in the first place. And I'm not convinced that they do believe it. What motivates is whether or not they can get mileage for their own ends out of a scandal, whether it be a good laugh during a "late night" monologue, good revenue from a juicy film, increased readership, or beating down people of faith. Anything that might shine a bright light on their own darkness is to be conveniently ignored.


You should hear the people on the radio saying "hey, it was the 1970's, sexual freedom, etc"

The child was 13 years old. He needs to spend the rest of his life in jail.

_________________
-Lou (Louis)
Image
ORA et LABORA
Totus Tuus
Cacciatore/Fungaiolo
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 14:22 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15611
Location: Los Angeles, CA
So, does everybody agree that whatever standard is applied to celebs and movie directors should also be applied to priests?

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 17:03 
Offline
Forum Staff
Forum Staff
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 12:15
Posts: 11439
Location: State of Michigan, USA
LASaxman wrote:
So, does everybody agree that whatever standard is applied to celebs and movie directors should also be applied to priests?


Well, that would certainly be a step backward, don't you think? Unless you are referring to the standard of adoration society gives to celebs and movie directors and Oprah (who is in a class by herself)...it would be nice if priests were respected and listened to as much.

_________________
Dean
Most people's sense of history goes back to breakfast time - Benjamin Netanyahu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 18:31 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15611
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Dean wrote:
LASaxman wrote:
So, does everybody agree that whatever standard is applied to celebs and movie directors should also be applied to priests?
Well, that would certainly be a step backward, don't you think? Unless you are referring to the standard of adoration society gives to celebs and movie directors and Oprah (who is in a class by herself)...it would be nice if priests were respected and listened to as much.

I was talking about the standard they are held to so far as society judging their sins. And I wasn't really serious, but that seemed to be what was being suggested in some previous posts. :roll:

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 18:53 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
All,

According to (then) LA Deputy District Attorney David Wells at the time of the trial it was suggested to Polanski's attorneys that Polanski would be deported.

So, do I have this right? You're extraditing him in order that you might deport him?

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 19:10 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15611
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
So, do I have this right? You're extraditing him in order that you might deport him?
James,

We are extraditing him (actually nobody consulted me :wink: ) in order to try him. I think the penalty would be up to the judge and jury.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2009 19:16 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

He has already (in 1977) plead guilty (as the result of a plea bargain). All that remains is to sentence him. It was intended that he be deported, but he fled before sentence could be imposed.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Sep 2009 10:30 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15742
Location: Southern California, Catholic
Seamas O Dalaigh wrote:
All,

According to (then) LA Deputy District Attorney David Wells at the time of the trial it was suggested to Polanski's attorneys that Polanski would be deported.

So, do I have this right? You're extraditing him in order that you might deport him?
I think he fled because he thought the judge was going to require some prison time and then deport him.

Of course now they can also prosecute him for jumping bail.

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009 09:50 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15611
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Does this news prove the premise of this thread?

Bishop faces child pornography charges

Quote:
A Roman Catholic bishop in Canada, who resigned after child pornography was discovered on his computer, has handed himself into the police, according to reports last night.

When Raymond Lahey, 69, resigned as Bishop of Antigonish, Nova Scotia, on Wednesday, he told Catholics he was taking time out for “personal renewal”.

In his formal resignation letter, he said he was resigning for “personal reasons”.

But it emerged later that when he was returning from a trip to the US last month, customs officials at Ottawa airport had conducted random search of his laptop and found child pornography images

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009 10:07 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15611
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Here is the same story on COL.

Canadian bishop arrested on Charges of Possessing Child Pornography

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009 16:21 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 05:16
Posts: 15742
Location: Southern California, Catholic
I am reminded of a story I heard many years ago. The director of one of the top USSR research labs returned from a trip abroad. As a high official he was able to bypass the customs line. However, they were trying out some new equipment further down the line and it alarmed on him. He was carrying several pounds of gold.


It was at a time when the government was mellowing. He got to try out some career broadening in Siberia. He was expected back at the lab in a couple of years.

_________________
- Joe Kelley

Death is only a shadow across the path to Heaven.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Jul 2010 21:23 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2002 16:21
Posts: 15611
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Well, the Swiss have decided. No extradition for Polanski.

_________________
David L (CA)
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Jul 2010 15:27 
Offline
Master Member
Master Member
User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 01:07
Posts: 14695
Location: Sydney, Australia
David,

The legal reasoning is interesting.

Quote:
The turning point in the case occurred in mid-March, when Mr. Polanski’s lawyers disclosed in an appeals brief that Roger Gunson, a now-retired lawyer who originally prosecuted the case, had given sealed testimony describing a plan by Judge Laurence J. Rittenband, the original judge, to limit Mr. Polanski’s sentence to a 90-day psychiatric evaluation, a portion of which Mr. Polanski had served during his 42 days in Chino State Prison.

Mr. Gunson, who gave the testimony in January, also described his own reservations about the handling of the case by Judge Rittenband, who is now deceased.

Courts here refused to open Mr. Gunson’s testimony, which was taken provisionally, because he was gravely ill, and was supposed to be used at Mr. Polanski’s eventual sentencing. But Mr. Polanski’s legal team described the testimony in court filings that were widely described by media outlets.

The Swiss authorities, without success, requested access to the Gunson account, arguing that it would have established whether the judge had assured Mr. Polanski that time he spent in a psychiatric unit would constitute the whole of his period of imprisonment.

“If this were the case, Roman Polanski would actually have already served his sentence, and therefore both the proceedings on which the U.S. extradition request is founded and the request itself would have no foundation,” the Swiss Justice Ministry said in a statement.




http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/movie ... tml?src=mv

I believe Interpol still have a warrant for his arrest.

_________________
James Daly

"It is the Lord." (Jn 21:7)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group